1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolbaska11 [484]
4 years ago
5

The answer and how you got it

Mathematics
1 answer:
mart [117]4 years ago
8 0
The answer is 12
12-(5+3)=4
4+8=12
You might be interested in
Bill weights 120 pounds and is gaining 10 pounds each month. Phil weights 150 pounds and is gaining 4 pounds each month. How man
Leviafan [203]

The answer should be 3 months

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the y-intercept of a line that passes through the points (5, -6.5) and (-12, 2)?
n200080 [17]

Answer:

y-intercept = -4

Step-by-step explanation:

equation of a line: y=mx+b

two points given are (5, -6.5) and (-12, 2)

first we can easily find value of m or the slope, by using the slope formula. the value of m=-0.5.

formua to find m: \frac{2-(-6.5)}{-12-5}= -0.5

to find the value of b (the y-intercept), we need to plug in a y and x value, we are given 2 ordered pairs, you can use either one and plug x-value in for x and the y-value in for y.

if i plug in (5, -6.5), my equation looks like this: -6.5=5(-0.5)+b

then you just solve for b and it turns out to be -4.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the variation constant for an inverse squared relationship where we know x = –4 and y = 3?
stich3 [128]
Let the constant be k.

For an inverse squared proportion the formula is y = k/x^2

Insert values of y and x into the formula.
3 = k/(-4)^2
3(-4)^2 = k
k = 3(16)
k = 48

Hope this helps. :)
6 0
3 years ago
If -3 is a lower bound for the real zeros of f(x), then -2 is also a lower bound.
vladimir1956 [14]

The statement is false, because -2 is larger than -3.

<h3>Is the statement true?</h3>

We know that -3 is a lower bound for the real zeros of f(x).

So, if we define k as the smallest real zero of f(x), we have:

-3 < k.

Then we can take, for example, k = -2.5

That is an allowed value for the real zero.

In that case, -2 is not a lower bound, because is false that:

-2 < k = -2.5

Then if -3 is a lower bound for the real zeros of f(x), we can't assume that -2 is also a lower bound (because -2 is larger than -3).

If you want to learn more about lower bounds:

brainly.com/question/15991714

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Use pemdas (18 - 14) x (4 x 2) write 3 steps
Deffense [45]

Answer:

32

Step-by-step explanation:

Parentheses:

(18 - 14) = 4

(4 x 2) = 8

4 x 8

Multiplication:

4 x 8 = 32

<em>good luck hope this helps :)</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A triangle has one side measuring 13 millimeters and two sides measuring 11 millimeters. Is this triangle scalene?
    15·2 answers
  • Can you help me with this question only number 5
    7·1 answer
  • Very hungry from all from all of this shopping. The giant family purchased five appetizers for 1.9 x10^5 each. seven entrees for
    7·1 answer
  • Show all the work to multiply (3+V-16)(6-v-64)
    10·1 answer
  • Marcus is 5 19/24 feet tall. Ben is 5 11/16 feet tall. Which of the two boys is taller?
    7·1 answer
  • Which expression is equal too |-12| -|3|
    15·2 answers
  • This graph shows the water level in a bathtub, in inches, over time (in minutes).
    9·1 answer
  • Determine if the side lengths 9, 9, and 17 form a triangle. If it is a triangle, classify it by its sides. It's not a triangle.
    5·2 answers
  • the store is having a promotion. for every 8 glasses you buy, you get 3 free plates. Malcolm got 9 free plates. how many glasses
    5·2 answers
  • PLUS 31 POINTS WILL MARK BRAINLIEST Complete the following:
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!