1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sladkaya [172]
3 years ago
7

When she was in college, Jammie Thomas-Rasset wrote a case study on Napster, the online peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing network,

and knew that it was shut down because it was illegal. Later, Capitol Records, Inc., which owns the copyrights to a large number of music recordings, discovered that "tereastarr"—a user name associated with Thomas-Rasset’s Internet protocol address—had made twenty-four songs available for distribution on KaZaA, another P2P network. Capitol notified Thomas-Rasset that she had been identified as engaging in the unauthorized trading of music. She replaced the hard drive on her computer with a new drive that did not contain the songs in dispute. Is Thomas-Rasset liable for copyright infringement?What action did Thomas-Rasset have to take in order to share twenty-four copyrighted songs available for distribution on KaZaA?SelectA. Shared her downloaded music files using KaZaAB. Shared her purchased music files with a friend2. Is file sharing always prohibited?SelectA. YesB. No3. File sharing is prohibitedSelectA. when it is used to download and store copyrighted musicB. when it is used to listen to music.4. Did Jammie share copyrighted music?SelectA. YesB. No5. Sharing copyrighted music constitutes infringement under theSelectA. Copyright ActB. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act6. Capitol notified Thomas-Rasset that she had been identified as engaging in the unauthorized trading of music. She replaced the hard drive on her computer with a new drive that did not contain the songs in dispute. Can Thomas-Rasset remedy her wrongful conduct by replacing her hard drive?SelectA. YesB. No7. Why or why not? The illegal file sharing Select A. was B. was not already done.8. Who is an innocent infringer? A person who Select A. is B. is not aware and had no reason to believe that his or her acts constituted copyright infringement.9. Was Thomas-Rasset an innocent infringer?SelectA. Yes B. No10. Why? She had just done a case study on Napster and knew file sharing wasSelectA. RightB. Wrong11. Did Thomas-Rasset help her case by replacing her hard drive to conceal her acts?SelectA. Yes B. No12. Was Thomas-Rasset’s act of replacing her hard drive ethical?SelectA. YesB. No13. The civil remedies of Select A. injunction B. damages C. criminal conviction and Select A. injunction B. damages C. criminal conviction are available to the owners of the copyrighted songs.14. Would a court likely find Thomas-Rasset reliable for copyright infringement?SelectA. YesB. No15. WHAT IF THE FACTS WERE DIFFERNT?What if Thomas-Rasset had not shared files, but rather used digital samplings in her college project presentation? Would that have possibly changed the result?SelectA. YesB. No16. Why?1. Select A.Some courts have not found digital sampling illegal. B. Thomas-Rasset's use was fair use for educational purposes.C. Thomas-Rasset may have been an innocent infringer.D. Thomas-Rasset's motives were altruistic.E. Thomas-Rasset did not know about copyright law.2. SelectA.Some courts have not found digital sampling illegal. B. Thomas-Rasset's use was fair use for educational purposes.C. Thomas-Rasset may have been an innocent infringer.D. Thomas-Rasset's motives were altruistic.E. Thomas-Rasset did not know about copyright law.3. SelectA.Some courts have not found digital sampling illegal. B. Thomas-Rasset's use was fair use for educational purposes.C. Thomas-Rasset may have been an innocent infringer.D. Thomas-Rasset's motives were altruistic.E. Thomas-Rasset did not know about copyright law.
Business
1 answer:
andrezito [222]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

1. Is Thomas-Rasset liable for copyright infringement? Yes he is liable for copyright infringement. What action did Thomas-Rasset have to take in order to share twenty-four copyrighted songs available for distribution on KaZaA?

-shared her downloaded music files using kazaa

2.Is file sharing always prohibited?NO

3. File sharing is prohibited _____.

when it is used to download and store ---copyrighted music

4. Did Jammie share copyrighted music?YES

5.Sharing copyrighted music constitutes infringement under the

- copyright act

6. Can Thomas-Rasset remedy her wrongful conduct by replacing her hard drive?NO

7.Why or why not? The illegal file sharing WAS already done.

8.Who is an innocent infringer? A person who IS NOT aware and had no reason to believe that his or her acts constituted copyright infringement.

9. Was Thomas-Rasset an innocent infringer? NO

10. Why? She had written a case study on Napster and knew file sharing was WRONG.

11.Did Thomas-Rasset help her case by replacing her hard drive to conceal her acts?B. NO

12. Was Thomas-Rasset’s act of replacing her hard drive ethical?NO

13. The civil remedies of A. INJUCTION and B. DAMAGES are available to the owners of the copyrighted songs.

14. Would a court likely find Thomas-Rasset reliable for copyright infringement? YES

15. WHAT IF THE FACTS WERE DIFFERENT?What if Thomas-Rasset had not shared files, but rather used digital samplings in her college project presentation? Would that have possibly changed the result?YES

16. Why?A.Some courts have not found digital sampling illegal. B. Thomas-Rasset's use was fair use for educational purposes.

You might be interested in
Ariana and John, who file a joint return, have two dependent children, Kai and Angel. Kai is a freshman at State University and
mihalych1998 [28]

The amounts and types of education tax credits that Ariana and John can take without modified AGI limitation are as follows:

              Amount of Education Tax     Type of Education Tax Credits

For Kai      $1,000 ($2,500 x 40%)        The American Opportunity Credit

For Angel $1,560 ($7,800 x 20%)        The Lifetime Learning Credit

Total tax credit = $2,560 ($1,000 + $1,560)

<h3>What are the American Opportunity Credit and the Lifetime Learning Credit?</h3>

Whereas the American Opportunity Credit (Kia's) covers only the first 4 years of post-secondary education at 40% of $2,500 per student because Kia is a half-time student, the Lifetime Learning Credit applies to graduate schooling (Angel's) and covers 20% of the first $10,000 paid for tuition.

We must note that no taxpayer can claim both the American Opportunity Credit and the Lifetime Learning Credit for the same student in the same tax year.

Thus, the total education tax credit that Ariana and John can claim for both Kai and Angel is $2,560.

Learn more about education tax credits at brainly.com/question/8166956

6 0
1 year ago
The net of a triangular prism is shown below.
harkovskaia [24]

The perimeter is the sum of all three sides of the triangle. In this case it is 18.

<u>Explanation:</u>

In geometry, a triangular crystal is a three-sided crystal; it is a polyhedron made of a triangular base, a deciphered duplicate, and 3 faces joining comparing sides. A privilege triangular crystal has rectangular sides, else it is angled.

A triangular prism has two triangular bases and three rectangular sides and is a pentahedron since it has five countenances. Outdoors tents, triangular rooftops and "Toblerone" wrappers - chocolate pieces of candy - are instances of triangular prisms.

6 0
3 years ago
The _______________ Act of 1764 was an attempt to increase taxes by lowering the rate and increasing consumption.
frutty [35]
The answer is the sugar act.
3 0
2 years ago
Suppose the real risk-free rate is 3.50% and the future rate of inflation is expected to be constant at 2.20%. What rate of retu
muminat

Answer:

1.27%

Explanation:

Rate of return = [(1+real risk free rate)/(1+inflation rate)]-1

real risk free rate = 3.5%

inflation rate = 2.20%

Therefore Rate of return = [(1+ 3.5%)/(1+2.20%)]-1

=1.27%

5 0
3 years ago
True or false: it doesn’t matter whether you compute marginal cost using total cost or variable cost.
Elena L [17]
It is TRUE. Marginal cost is the amount added when there is an additional unit of product or service produced. Meanwhile, the total cost, as defined in accounting, is composed of the total fixed costs and its total variable costs. Fixed cost is not affected by the number of output a company produced. Thus it won’t affect the marginal cost. 

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • With the indirect method for determining net cash flows from operations, depreciation is: a. subtracted from net income. b. subt
    5·1 answer
  • For a honda accord, some factors shift demand left and others shift it right, as shown. classify each factor by how it shifts th
    14·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    10·1 answer
  • You can assume that all fluids you will reason about in this course are incompressible. what does incompressible mean?
    14·1 answer
  • received a cheque from Karim,being full settlement of the amount owing after allowing him a cash discount of 5%​
    6·1 answer
  • Your brother has asked you to help him to choose an investment. He has $6,000 to invest today for a period of two years. You ide
    11·1 answer
  • Granny Gums has established a scholarship at the Martin College of Dentistry. She will make deposits into an endowment account t
    8·1 answer
  • Coins, currency, demand deposits and travelers checks fit what definition of money supply?
    10·1 answer
  • T or F #9 LAST ONE QUICKLYYY
    7·1 answer
  • In the model of mass-mediated communication, the: Select one: producers of the message control the reception of the content prod
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!