This statement is true. As there is the growing emphasis on the strategic supply management processes and less on the purchase transactions.
Effective interpretation of corporate and supplier objectives, selection of appropriate actions to achieve objectives and integration of inventory information into organizational strategies. hiring professionals trained specifically in supply management, providing them with technical knowledge and long-term leadership development. emphasizing strategic cost management, engaging key suppliers early in the process, and measuring reductions in total cost of ownership. Supply management has evolved from a process-oriented, strategic function to a transactional, tactical function. The reduction in inventory investment comes primarily from users reducing their demand for stocked items. Therefore the statement is true.
Learn more about supply management.
brainly.com/question/25843620
#SPJ4
Answer:
The after-tax cost is $23,940
Explanation:
For computing the after-tax cost, first we have to compute the present value which is shown below:
Present value = Bill payment × marginal tax rate
= $38,000 × 37%
= $14,060
So, after tax value would equal to
= Bill payment or Pre tax value - Present value
= $38,000 - $14,060
= $23,940
Options:
A. Operational
B. Tactical
C. Static
D. Strategic
D. Growth
Answer:D. Growth
Explanation:Growth plans are Activities put in place to enhance that an organisation attains its growth Objectives.
A Growth plan identifies potential opportunities for growth and makes the required resources available in irder to sponsor the potential opportunities.
A growth plan contains business elements which can help the a business Organisation identify the value of customers and how to meet the needs of the customers which will help to enhance the growth of the business through increased revenue.
It is difficult to compare relative job growth for different-sized
businesses because it is hard to determine the cutoff point at which a small
business becomes a large business. It is not easy to know the comparative job development
amongst businesses of different sizes. There are not the same parameters leading
the size of a small business versus a big business. Moreover, there is no defined
point where such a variation can be clearly identified.
I have the same question if anyone can help please let me know