Percent markup based on the selling price: 28.1%
Explanation:
The cost of the TV for the seller was
Of this, the markup of this price was 39%. Therefore, the value of the markup (in dollars) with respect to the cost for the seller was
So, this was the markup relative to the cost for the seller.
The price paid by the purchaser instead is
Therefore, the percent markup based on the selling price (paid by the purchaser) is:
Learn more about percentages:
brainly.com/question/82877
brainly.com/question/1834017
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
(A) $390,000
Explanation:
Under LIFO method as the name suggests "Last In First Out"
the goods purchased in Last that is latest are sold first, that is goods purchased in 2015 will be sold first, therefore in the given case at the end of 2014 using LIFO we have,
Balance = $390,000
Because balance of goods purchased in 2014 i.e. $756,000 is sold first in 2014 remaining inventory at year end will be of 2013
Correct option is
(A) $390,000
Answer:
New price (P1) = $72.88
Explanation:
Given:
Risk-free rate of interest (Rf) = 5%
Expected rate of market return (Rm) = 17%
Old price (P0) = $64
Dividend (D) = $2
Beta (β) = 1.0
New price (P1) = ?
Computation of expected rate on return:
Expected rate on return (r) = Rf + β(Rm - Rf)
Expected rate on return (r) = 5% + 1.0(17% - 5%)
Expected rate on return (r) = 5% + 1.0(12%)
Expected rate on return (r) = 5% + 12%
Expected rate on return (r) = 17%
Computation:
Expected rate on return (r) = (D + P1 - P0) / P0
17% = ($2 + P1 - $64) / $64
0.17 = (2 + P1 - $64) / $64
10.88 = P1 - $62
New price (P1) = $72.88
Answer: a. subject to analysis under the rule of reason.
Explanation:
The Rule of Reason is used to interpret whether he Sherman Act which is an anti-trust law has been breached. This Rule was established so as not to unfairly close down all monopolies and Monopolies are not illegal, price fixing is.
If companies therefore come together as Fertile Acres Inc., Growers Farm Co-op, and Harvest Orchards have done, the Government under the Rule of Reason will check to see if the actions of these firms was done in order for them to go against free trade practices. If it was not then the agreement might be allowed to stand.