Answer:
Explanation:
Unless the "additional duties" are extreme, you probably won't win. ... It's in a manager's best interest to keep duties related to the core function of the job. It's in an employee's best interest to do what needs to be done.
I can’t write an essay for you, but i
would recommend asking your self what didn’t you like about the remote learning. Then put them together into a paragraph using a lot of good words. Do that with every topic after. Use good grammar!
Answer:
Legal and Illegal Interview Questions:
Legal:
How many times a month were you late for work at your last job?
Did you graduate from high school?
Illegal:
Do you have any mental illnesses?
What year did you graduate from high school?
Explanation:
Employers of labor should be aware of some interview questions, which are deemed legal, and some others that may be deemed illegal to ask job candidates. For this reason, employers should be careful to ensure they play by the rules. The illegal questions are considered so because they tend to exacerbate discrimination. Examples of interview questions that are deemed illegal are questions relating to age. Others include questions about marital status and parental status. Some other illegal questions relate to citizenship status, mental illness status, religious affiliations, and race or skin color.
Answer:
Wartime actions.
Explanation:
This statement can be proved by Schenck v. United States (1917).
Schenck was a member of the Socialist Party, and at the time (World War I), the party vehemently opposed the U.S. Draft. As a result of this opposition, Schenck followed the views of his party, and took it upon himself to distribute pamphlets, encouraging people to avoid the draft. Schenck was arrested for violating the 1917 Espionage Act. Schenck made an appeal, arguing that the Espionage Act violated the First Amendment, and eventually that case made it to the Supreme Court of the United States. In the Court's written opinion, it's stated:
"When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in a time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right," (Justice Holmes.)
The Court ruled that the Espionage Act was not in violation of the First Amendment, due to the specific context of this case being "wartime."
