Answer:
The answer is the first one : all laws
Answer:
Brayden should dispose of the gum
Explanation:
In the given scenario the law in Singapore states that having chewing gum is illegal. As far as Brayden is in Singapore he should comply with the law there.
The equal protection clause is a provision of law that states that all citizens must be treated equally under the law.
Although this gives one the right to take retain actions, in this case Brayden will be restricted from having chewing gum.
Of he is allowed to carry chewing gum then he expects to be treated differently from others in Singapore. This violates the equal protection clause
Answer:
The correct answer is C. The Communications Decency Act of 1996 gives immunity to providers of interactive computer services for liability they might otherwise incur on account of material disseminated by them but created by others.
Explanation:
The Communications Decency Act (CDA) was part of the 1996 US Telecommunications Act. The bill was passed by the US Congress on February 6, 1996. His main goal was the regulation of adult sites on the Internet. However, activists, civil rights movements such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which fought for freedom of expression, almost completely rebuilt the CDA. The result was a law that promoted freedom of expression, since henceforth, no information provider on the Internet had to fear more, to be held accountable for contributions from its customers.
Section 230 of the CDA added to the law valuable protection for Internet service providers and users against any action that might be taken by third parties. It is literally stated that no provider or user of an interactive computer offer may be treated as the author of information originating from another information provider. This part of the CDA, the so-called provider privilege, remains in force.
Answer:
ya i agree with your opinion because you have given 50 points lol
The Constitution protects property rights through the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments' Due Process Clauses and, more directly, through the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause: "nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
