According to Washington, to stop a rebellion, you need a strong armed force to crush it. During his time, the US is just untied. Many Americans doesn't trust the government. To show power and authority, Washington believes that when a rebellion is formed, you need to force it to stop. The federal government is the power to check these rebellions. If the government don't, who would protect the citizens and their human rights?
Traditionally, faith and reason have each been considered to be sources of justification for religious belief. Because both can purportedly serve this same epistemic function, it has been a matter of much interest to philosophers and theologians how the two are related and thus how the rational agent should treat claims derived from either source. Some have held that there can be no conflict between the two—that reason properly employed and faith properly understood will never produce contradictory or competing claims—whereas others have maintained that faith and reason can (or even must) be in genuine contention over certain propositions or methodologies.
Correct answer: It took longer and they were treated poorly, reflecting the widespread bias against Asians.
Answer: wasn't it Natives, weather and religious diversity?
Explanation:
