Explanation:
Britain did ban forced marriages in 2014 with taken action to rescue underaged girls from abroad and in that way they issued forced marriage protection orders.
Now in Wales in Englas, if you want to get married and you are underage you must have parental consent to get married but there is the possibility to get married in Scotland without the consent of your parents if you are 16 or 17 years old.
it was so devastating to carter that
If the current president is assassinated, then the vice president will assume the role of president.
Answer:
Ottoman empire an imperial state the founded in 1299 after the breakdown of Turkish tribes.
Explanation:
Ottoman empire in included the ares of Turkey,Romania, Hungry and Jordan parts of the Arabian peninsula.
- Ottoman began to control other state to the belonging to the former empire dynasties to controlled by the ottoman Turks.
- Ottoman empire was to grow other countries weak and unorganized had the military organization and tactics for the time.
- Ottoman empire considerable decline in power after several military defeats,created during that time caused the lose of economic independence.
- Ottoman empire is recognized by the congress of Paris it was still losing in strength as a European power,ottoman empire officially came to an end with treaty and serves.
- Ottoman empire is the most one of the largest and most successful empires in the world history, and they include its very strong and organized military and political structure.
- Ottoman empire success can not be attributed to any single factor, and they continually adapted to changing circumstances.
- Ottoman tribes was based not on blood ties but on political expedience and came to the some great warrior family.
- Ottoman as zealous religious warriors dedicated to the spread of Islam.
Answer:
Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.
In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.
What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.
