1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
galben [10]
3 years ago
11

Television cameras showed Birmingham police chief "Bull" Connor ordering officers to use fire hoses and dogs against civil right

s marchers in the 1960s. Who actually benefited the most from Connor's actions?
A. white racists, because they were able to keep Birmingham from changing

B. "Bull" Connor, because he became a well-respected TV celebrity

C. the civil rights movement, because people saw what racism in the South was like

D. black and white children, because they gained new respect for the police
History
2 answers:
dangina [55]3 years ago
7 0
(C) seems the most logical
Nesterboy [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is C. The Civil Rights Movement benefited the most from Bull Connor's represive actions in the 1960s, as people saw what racism in the South was like.

Explanation:

"Bull" Connor was an American politician and administrative official. He became known mainly through his strict enforcement of segregation and his violent crackdown on peaceful demonstrators of the civil rights movement in the early 1960s in Birmingham, Alabama.

Although not a member of the Ku Klux Klan himself, Bull Connor, as police chief of Birmingham, exposed the same violence used by the clan. In 1961, he prevented police intervention when KKK members at a bus stop beat together a group of civil rights activists. Through such actions and the poor image of the city in the media as a source of racial conflict, Connor lost the backing even in the majority of white residents.

You might be interested in
Why did Indian removal have a negative economic impact on the American Indian tribes that were relocated to
marta [7]

Answer:

Due to lost of their property.

Explanation:

The Indian removal act has a negative economic impact on the American Indian tribes that were relocated to  Oklahoma because they lost all their property that was present at their original place. They have to start their lives from the beginning and lives according to the available resources of that Oklahoma location. They were not paid for their property by the American government which leads to bad economic condition.

3 0
2 years ago
The fundamental cause of the Peloponnesian War was __________.
mel-nik [20]
The fundamental cause of the Peloponnesian War was Sparta's dear and jealousy of the power and wealth of Athens. This caused Sparta to push many city-states to turn against Athens, as well as some citizens of Athens to turn against their own city-state. The Peloponnesian War was fought in three stages or phases as historians like to call them and took place from 431-404 BC.
6 0
3 years ago
How did the role of religion differ between feudal Japan and feudal Europe
uysha [10]
<span>That's an interesting question. Feudal Japan had a more formalized and ritualized kind of culture than feudal Europe did; elaborate rules of courtesy applied at all levels of society, whereas European peasants were pretty crude for the most part. In both societies there was a unifying religious principle, which in Europe was Christianity and the authority of the Church, and in Japan was shintoism and the authority of the Emperor. In both cases, a social hierarchy attempted, with considerable success, to control everyone's lives; everyone owed their fealty to someone, except for the kings in Europe or the Emperor in Japan, who didn't owe loyalty to anyone, since there was no higher authority (at least, not counting deities). Both societies had similar types of weaponry (European armor was considerably tougher) and skilled swordsmen were much to be feared and respected. In the lower classes, life was cheap. Neither society had any concept of human rights; only the nobility had rights.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What states’ rights debate of the early and mid-1800s
Norma-Jean [14]

Answer:

The states' rights debate of the early and mid-1800's were about a conflict between the idea of federalism and sectionalism.

7 0
3 years ago
An archipelago is a(n)_______.
grigory [225]

Answer:

An archipelago is a chain, cluster or collection of islands, or sometimes a sea containing a small number of scattered islands.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did trade contribute to the rise of the sudanic states ?
    15·2 answers
  • What were Americans afraid the Soviet’s were trying to do
    11·2 answers
  • What new ideas were introduced with scholasticism
    14·2 answers
  • Why was battle of saratoga a turning point in the war
    7·1 answer
  • The political side grew more popular in the 1980s?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the nature of fishing in the area up until about 1880
    14·1 answer
  • If a person does not pay their taxes, he or she can be charged with a crime. Why is it important for all people to pay their tax
    13·2 answers
  • ¿En qué consistió el levantamiento de Túpac Amaru?
    9·2 answers
  • Hey help please I'm on a test I have 1 hour left!
    13·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!