10 examples of synonyms and opposites.
Magkasingkahulugan (synonyms) are words or phrases that has the same meaning.
Examples of magkasingkahulugan are:
1) mataba / malusog (healthy) 6) mahirap / dukha (poor)
2) magaling / mahusay (skilled) 7) matulin / mabilis (fast)
3) mabango / mahalimuyak (fragrant) 8) matalino / marunong (smart)
4) maginaw / malamig (cold) 9) bata / musmos (child)
5) marumi / madungis (dirty) 10) aralin / leksiyon (lesson)
Magkasalungat (opposite) term used to identify someone or something that is directly different from another one or another thing
Examples of magkasalungat are:
1) masaya / malungkot (happy / sad) 6) mainit / malamig (hot / cold)
2) pataas / pababa (up / down) 7) malapit / malayo (near / far)
3) kaliwa / kanan (left / right) 8) tahimik / maingay (quiet / noisy)
4) tama / mali (right / wrong) 9) mabango / mabaho (sweet smelling / foul smelling)
5) malambot / matigas (soft / hard) 10) maganda / panget (pretty / ugly)
Answer:
the North European Plains
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is D. generativity versus stagnation
Explanation:
GENERATIVITY VERSUS STAGNATION of Erikson's psychosocial stages of development emphasizes the need for older adults to mentor and help younger people
The most accurate conclusion concerning age-related changes in taste sensitivity is that D. the ability to detect certain tastes declines gradually, but this varies greatly from taste to taste and person to person.
<h3>What is taste sensitivity?</h3>
It should be noted that taste sensitivity simply means the minimum concentration at which an individual can perceive the quality of test.
Here, the most accurate conclusion concerning age-related changes in taste sensitivity is that the ability to detect certain tastes declines gradually, but this varies greatly from taste to taste and person to person.
Learn more about taste on:
brainly.com/question/342568
#SPJ1
Answer:
The judicial branch Can rule their actions as 'unconstitutional'
Explanation:
The Supreme court justices that made the decisions couldn't be fired by the President. So , if the president blatantly did something that violate the constitution, the judicial branch could easily ruled it out and fix it. This will limit the actions that the president can do and prevent the president from becoming to tyrannical.
The judicial branch could also do the same thing for the legislative branches. The legislative branch basically has the power to pass the law. But the judicial branch has the power to examine the law before it's passed to find out whether the law violate any rules /amendments written on the constitution.
