Answer:
The advantage is like the article stated "Over time, J. T. guided Sudhir into a world that few outsiders have ever known,". To put into lamen's terms Sudhir got a inside peek at what most researches look away or far back from a cage of violence, prositution and gangs. The disadvantage can be a ethical, moral case that Sudhir violated. For example, by getting involved in the action of what he was studying, he messed with the research by becoming a recipient in the study and now there's question the validity. He doesn't need to justify because he was a bystander and besides what's the best course of action when two criminal gangs decide to fight each with guns, call the police? When it had to due with beatings although I more of a moral grey area for me based on the fact that I'm just a bistander and there's no guns involved. I think the opposition's main argument is that Sudhir was reckless and he's moral compass is secrewed up
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
Answer:
Disruptive innovation.
Explanation:
Disruptive innovation is one that creates a new value network and market while disrupting existing market structures. It displaces existing firms, alliances and products.
For example with the introduction of the internet face-to-face business was changed, and most businesses started conducting business online. Businesses that failed to buy in to the change were negatively affected.
In the given instance Sunshine Technologies introduced a tablet that could run completely on solar energy and was less expensive than competitors' tablets. This was a game changer in the industry with downside that the battery needed frequent recharging. But this was eventually resolved.
Answer:
Reconstruction (1865-1877), the turbulent era following the Civil War, was the effort to reintegrate Southern states from the Confederacy and 4 million newly-freed people into the United States.
Yes.
The framers intended to have three co-equal branches of government.
For the Supreme Court to be on the same level of the Congress or the Executive, they would need a tool in their arsenal to make that possible.
That tool is judicial review.
