1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Minchanka [31]
3 years ago
14

Suppose the only input in agriculture is time and the following chart depicts the time it took for the Middle Colonies and New E

ngland to produce barley and milk. Using the principle of comparative advantage, what would be the most efficient solution?Time Required to Produce:Time to produce: New England Middle Colonies1 ton of barley 4 hours 5 hours1 ton of milk 3 hours 6 hours a. New England produces both barley and milk. b. New England produces barley and the Middle Colonies produce milk. c. New England produces milk and the Middle Colonies produce barley. d. There is insufficient information given to determine comparative advantage.
Business
1 answer:
belka [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

New England produces Milk and Middle Colonies produces Barley is correct.

Explanation:

New England's opportunity cost of producing barley= 4/3 = 1.33 ton of milk

New England's opportunity cost of producing Milk = 3/4= 0.75 ton of barley.

Because New England has lower opportunity in the production of Milk .Therefore,it has the comparative advantage in the production of Milk. Hence, New england produces Milk.

Similarly, Middle Colonies's opportunity cost of producing Barley= 5/6= 0.83 ton of milk.

And Middle colonies opportunity cost of producing Milk= 6/5= 1.2 ton of barley.

Because Middle colonies opportunity cost in the production of Barley . Therefore, it has the comparative advantage in the production of Barley. Hence, Middle colonies produces Barley.

Hence,option(C) i.e New England produces Milk and Middle Colonies produces Barley is correct.

You might be interested in
Indigo Ink Supply paid a dividend of $5 last year on its common stock. It is expected that this dividend will grow at a rate of
pychu [463]

Answer:

a.

1st $5.43

2nd $5.89

3rd $6.39

4th $6.93

5th $7.52

6th $7.81

b.

$75.85

Explanation:

Dividend is the payment to the stockholders out of earning of the company. Companies have a dividend policy which determine the future dividend payments.

Dividend of each year can be calculated by using the growth rate as a discount in the compounding formula.

Dividend Payment

First year = $5 x ( 1 + 8.5% )^1 = $5.43

Second year = $5 x ( 1 + 8.5% )^2 = $5.89

Third year = $5 x ( 1 + 8.5% )^3 = $6.39

Fourth year = $5 x ( 1 + 8.5% )^4 = $6.93

Fifth year =$5 x ( 1 + 8.5% )^5 = $7.52

Sixth year = $7.52 x ( 1 + 3.8% )^1 = $7.81

b.

Intrinsic value of the stock is the present value of all the associated dividends

We need to calculate the present value of all the dividend payment.

First year = $5.43 x ( 1 + 11.5% )^-1 =  $4.87

Second year = $5.89 x ( 1 + 11.5% )^-2 = $4.74

Third year = $6.39 x ( 1 + 11.5% )^-3 = $4.61

Fourth year = $6.93 x ( 1 + 11.5% )^-4 = $4.48

Fifth year = $7.52 x ( 1 + 11.5% )^-5 = $4.36

After fifth year the dividend will be discounted as follow

PV of dividend after fifth year = [ $7.81 / (11.5% - 3.8%) ] x [ (1+11.5%)^-6 ] = $52.79

Intrinsic Value of Stock = Sum of PV of all dividends = $4.87 + $4.74 + $4.61 + $4.48 + $4.36 + $52.79 = $75.85

6 0
3 years ago
In July 2008, the average price of gasoline in the United States was $4.09 per gallon and consumers bought 6 percent less gasoli
Basile [38]

Answer:

PED= 0.1571

Explanation:

The price elasticity of demand (PED) indicates how the quantity demanded change when the price changes. Is defined by this equation:  

Price Elasticity of Demand = Percentage change in Q/ Percentage change in P  

In this case, the problem is giving percentage changes in Q but we must calculate the percentage change in price:

%Change in price = ( p2-p1/p1)*100= ($4.09-$2.96)/$2.96= 0.3817*100=38.17%

%Change in quantity is= -6%

PED= -6%/38.17%

In absolute value:

PED= 0.1571

If the PED is less than 1 then gasoline is considered as inelastic.

6 0
3 years ago
Your firm is considering opening a branch office in Kyle. The office would cost $485,000 to build the office. During the office
wariber [46]

Answer:

The NPV from opening the branch office is negative ( -$106668.08). Thus the branch office should not be opened.

Explanation:

The decision to open the branch office will be taken based on the NPV provided by opening of the branch office. If the NPV of a project is positive based on the required rate of return used as a discount rate fro cash flows, the investment is worth undertaking.

The net present value (NPV) for a project can be calculated as,

NPV = CF1 / (1+r)  + CF2 / (1+r)²  + ...  + CFn / (1+r)^n  -  Initial Outlay

Where,

  • r is the appropriate discount rate
  • Initial Outlay is the Initial cost of the project
  • CF represents cash flows from the project

As the required return is 16%, we will take this as the appropriate discount rate.

NPV = 45000 / (1+0.16)  +  120000 / (1+0.16)²  +  150000 / (1+0.16)³  +

150000 / (1+0.16)^4  +  150000 / (1+0.16)^5  -  485000

NPV = - $106668.08

As the NPV from project is negative at a required return of 16%, the project should not be under taken and the branch office should not be open.

7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the three options from the perspective of cost. Which one do you believe will provide the most economical s
Anvisha [2.4K]

Incomplete question. The full question read:

Power Force Corporation Kip Himmer, executive vice president of operations of Power Force Corporation (PFC), is feeling stressed out. The producer of power tools for the do-it-yourself market is experiencing higher fulfillment costs as retailers change their buying patterns. They all seem to want smaller, more frequent shipments to a larger number of locations. And, the retailers' service expectations are on the rise. They are demanding advanced shipping notification, RFID tags on all products, and improved inventory visibility. Gone are the days when the retailers bought power tools by the truckload for delivery to a few regionally dispersed distribution centers. Instead, they are asking for smaller shipments to multiple distribution centers and direct delivery to stores. Some retailers are also inquiring about PFC's ability to deliver orders for individual customers direct to their homes. This drop-shipping strategy is completely new to PFC and Himmer worries that it could create major bottlenecks at the company's centralized delivery center that sits next to the factory in Louiseville Kentucky. And, all of these new requirements are accompanied by shorter order cycle time goals. Himmer feels that he is stuck between a rock and a hard place as the major home improvement chain stores (Home Depot, Lowe's, and True Value) account for more than 80 percent of PFC's sales. Although compliance is proving to be very expensive, PFC cannot afford to deny the requests. Doing so would have an unwelcome effect on revenues. After consulting with his fulfillment team, Himmer has come to the conclusion that he has three reasonable options to address the emerging marketplace requirements.

Option 1 - Upgrade the existing PFC distribution center in Kentucky to handle multiple order types and smaller shipments. Deploy warehouse automation to improve order fulfillment speed and efficiency.

Options 2 - Expand the PFC fulfillment network. Add regional distribution centers in Nevada and New Jersey to the existing Kentucky distribution center. Modify operational processes and flows so that orders for delivery centers, stores, and individual consumers can be fulfilled.

Options 3 - Outsource fulfillment to a capable third party logistics company so that PFC can focus its efforts on quality production, accurate demand planning, and lean inventory management.

Himmer's next step is to fully evaluate the three options and choose a path forward before his upcoming meeting with Marcia Avis, the owner of PFC. Avis will ask tough questions and Himmer must be confident in his recommendations.

<em>Compare and contrast the three options from the perspective of customer service. Which one do you believe will provide the most economical solution for PFC?</em>

Answer:

<u>Options 3 - Outsource fulfillment to a capable third party logistics company so that PFC can focus its efforts on quality production, accurate demand planning, and lean inventory management.</u>

Explanation:

In terms of cost, it will be preferable if Himmer outsourced the fulfillment objectives to another company that is capable because if for example, they decide to go with:

option 1: they will need to set aside large funds investing in physical infrastructure; such as upgrading the existing PFC distribution center in Kentucky, buying warehouse automation tools, etc. Or they chose;

option 2: It also requires even more funds to be able to expand and add new regional distribution centers in Nevada and New Jersey, etc.

7 0
3 years ago
The following information relates to Payleast Shoes Company. Assuming the company uses the periodic inventory system, solve for
rosijanka [135]

Answer:

A.$75,000

B.$60,000

C.$30,000

D.33%

E.$15,000

F.$3,500

G.$18,000

H.$34,500

I.31%

J.$18,000

K.$116,300

L.$90,300

M.31%

Explanation:

Payleast Shoes Company

2020

1.Net sales = $90,000

2.

Beginning Inventory = $12,000

Add Purchase (Gross) = $70,000

Less Returns/Allowance = $6,000

Less Purchase discounts = $4,000

Add Freight-in = $3,000

Cost of goods available for sale = $75,000

Less End inventory = $15,000

Cost of Sales = $60,000

3. Gross profit = $30,000

4. Gross Profit % = 33%

2021

1.Net sales = $110,000

2.

Beginning Inventory = $15,000

Add Purchase (Gross) = $82,500

Less Returns/Allowance = $5,000

Less Purchase discounts = $2,500

Add Freight-in = $3,500

Cost of goods available for sale = $93,500

Less End inventory = $18,000

Cost of Sales = $75,500

3. Gross profit = $34,500

4. Gross Profit % = 31%

2022

1.Net sales = $130,000

2.

Beginning Inventory = $18,000

Add Purchase (Gross) = $99,000

Less Returns/Allowance = $8,800

Less Purchase discounts = $1,900

Add Freight-in = $10,000

Cost of goods available for sale = $116,300

Less End inventory = $26,000

Cost of Sales = $90,300

3. Gross profit = $39,700

4. Gross Profit % = 31%

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This year, Clearwater Inc., will produce 55,600 hot water heaters at its plants in Harrisburg, PA in order to meet its expected
    10·1 answer
  • g Smiley Corporation wholesales repair products to equipment manufacturers. On April 1, 20Y1, Smiley issued $20,000,000 of five-
    15·1 answer
  • Why you believe it is important to align it with the organization's core goals and strategic direction?
    15·1 answer
  • The Draper Corporation is considering dropping its Doombug toy due to continuing losses. Data on the toy for the past year follo
    7·1 answer
  • A corporation is concerned about their exposure to criminal liability after the most recent election cycle placed a number of ne
    13·1 answer
  • As price falls along a downward sloping ordinary demand curve (in the x1, p1 plane), consumer utility will Group of answer choic
    12·1 answer
  • What box is it please answer if u know :)<br> 1 2 or 3?
    6·2 answers
  • Which company re locate in the us ?
    11·1 answer
  • JeMarcus is going to sell sporting apparel, which he has already purchased from manufacturers, and has signed a deal agreeing to
    9·1 answer
  • Treating people within an organization fairly and taking actions that do not discriminate against people in protected classes on
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!