immanent is the opposite to the term transcendent.
In theological discourse, the terms transcendent and immanent frequently coexist. God is beyond human experience, perception, or understanding, according to the concept of transcendence. God is knowable, perceivable, and able to be grasped because of his immanence. For instance, because Jesus Christ is God incarnate (in the flesh), anybody who knew him, perceived of him, or experienced him by one or more of their five senses in the first century would have seen him as immanent.
Though Jesus Christ lived on earth, the Christian Worldview holds that God is transcendent and not impending. Because of his transcendence, God is different from and beyond what we can understand. The Triune God is bigger, greater, and more lovely than anything that humans can truly comprehend, even though Jesus lived among us.
Hence, option A is the correct answer
To learn more about transcendence here,
brainly.com/question/1265987
#SPJ4
If all members of the House of Representatives votes, then at least 290 must vote to override. If all 100 Senate members vote, then at least 67 must vote for the veto.
Hope this helped:)
Explanation:
through the teaching of our elders,enlightment of the materials but i suggest that tou should check on goggle for proper explanation
Answer:
Ancient Egypt was divided into two parts - Lower Egypt, a fertile area of the land mostly located in the delta of Nile river and Upper Egypt, in southern more mountainous area. Besides this part of Egypt was covered with desert and was uninhabited.
Explanation:
Ancient Egypt is one of the world's first civilizations that has developed in the fertile strip of land near the Nile river. That is why Nile was a source of life of Egyptians. Most of the people were living in this strip and narrow land which allowed different labors to develop. Mountainous part of Egypt wasn't inhabited that much, but was rich with different metals.
Answer:
Southern colonies (agriculture), and New England Colonies
Explanation:
The Southern Colonies relied on plantations and cash crops in order to attain revenue, while the New England colonies relied more on fishing and lumber since the ground was less arable.
