Answer:
(This could be opinion based, but ok.)
Explanation:
should:Pluto was known as a planet for 75 years. This means that most people already knew it as a planet, and would be extremely confused. All of the books about planets would be inaccurate and changed. Not all people can access brand new books, leading to inaccurate information.
shouldn't: The same reason that it was unclassified as a planet. It does not adhere to all of the rules of being a planet. It is not completely round and does not have a round orbit around the sun. Pluto does not have every requirement to be a real planet, and therefor, it would be incorrect to have it classified wrongly.
I dont see any choices sorry wish i could help
The first question can be answered by science due to its logical features.
<h3>Why is land use more important than water use?</h3>
The above question is answered through science because this is a logical question and we know that science answers questions logically and experimentation.
So we can conclude that the first question can be answered by science.
Learn more about science here: brainly.com/question/17216882
Her hypothesis is wrong. <span>Increased </span>temperature<span> causes an increase in kinetic energy. The higher kinetic energy causes more motion in the </span>gas<span> molecules which break intermolecular bonds and escape from solution. Check out the graph below: As the </span>temperature<span> increases, the </span>solubility<span>of a </span>gas<span> decreases</span>
<span>This is a positive feedback. These episodes make the next glacial period even more severe and long-lasting than the one prior. This is due to the reflectance of the surface of the land having a positive relationship with how much energy is absorbed: as the reflectance increases, absorption decreases, and the glacial period increases in severity.</span>
