a. 3 × 10^0
b. 33. 6 × 10^0
c. 57. 6 × 10^2
d. 4. 0 × 10^-7
e. 7. 0 × 10^-1
<h3>What is scientific notation?</h3>
Scientific notation is simply a way of expressing numbers that are too large or small to be written in decimal form.
It may be referred to as standard index form or scientific form.
From the information given, we have;
a. 0. 000003 is written in standard form as;
= 3 × 10^-6 × 3 × 10^6
= 3 × 10^-6 + 3
= 3 × 10^0
= 3
b. 56, 000, 000. 00 is written in standard form as;
= 5. 6 × 10^7 × 6 × 10^-7
= 33. 6 × 10^7 -7
= 33. 6 × 10^0
= 33. 6
c. 8. 0 × 10^-3 × 7. 2 × 10^5
= 57. 6 × 10^-3 + 5
= 57. 6 × 10^2
d. 4. 0 × 10^-3 × 4. 0 × 10^-4
= 4. 0 ^ -3 +(-4)
= 4. 0 × 10^-7
e. 7. 0 × 10^3 × 7. 0 × 10^4
= 7. 0 × 10^ 3-4
= 7. 0 × 10^-1
Thus, scientific notation is also referred to as standard form.
Learn more about scientific notation here:
brainly.com/question/27862246
#SPJ1
The value of x must be 25.0. The correct option is the second option- 25.0
<h3>Solving Linear equations </h3>
From the question, we are to determine the value of x
From the given diagram, we can write that
m ∠SOR + m ∠UOR + m ∠TOU = 180° (<em>Sum of angles on a straight line</em>)
∴ (2x +8)° + (3x - 14)° + (3x -14)° = 180°
2x° + 8° + 3x° -14° + 3x° -14° = 180°
Collect like terms
2x° + 3x° + 3x° + 8° - 14° -14° = 180°
8x° -20° = 180°
8x° = 180° + 20°
8x° = 200°
x = 200/8
x = 25.0
Hence, the value of x must be 25.0. The correct option is the second option- 25.0
Learn more Solving linear equations here: brainly.com/question/1413277
#SPJ1
Answer:
y=-x +4
Step-by-step explanation:
y-2= -1(x-2)
y-2=-x +2
y= -x +4
Answer:
No, subtraction is NOT associative in rational numbers.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation: We are asked to state whether subtraction is associative in rational numbers or not. To explain with an example. The subtraction is NOT associative in rational numbers.
Answer:
a) a= (3/4)t
4a = 3t
b = (5/2)t
2b = 5t
b)See explanation below
c) It will take 30.075 hours for the whole business to make at least $500 profit
Step-by-step explanation:
a) First we would represent the information given in terms of amount of bracelet produced and time spent in production with variables in order to convert to linear equations
Let number of bracelet Darrelle makes = a
Number of bracelet Danica makes = b
Let the time spent in producing them in hours = t
Darrelle takes 4 hours to make 3 bracelets:
Rate of producing bracelet = (number of bracelet produced)/time
Rate = a/t = 3/4
4a = 3t
Linear equation form: y = mx + c
a= (3/4)t
The above equation is in the slope-intercept form indicating the intercept = 0 and slope = 3/4
4a - 3t = 0 (equation in standard form )
Danica makes 5 bracelets every 2 hours:
Rate of producing bracelet = (number of bracelet produced)/time
Rate = b/t = 5/2
2b = 5t
Linear equation form: y = mx + c
b = (5/2)t
The above equation is in the slope-intercept form indicating the intercept = 0 and slope = 5/2
2b - 5t = 0 (equation in standard form)
b) The equations are linear equations, hence they can be graphed.
But as regards graphing using special functions, this answer can only be answered by you as I'm not aware of the special functions discussed in the course.
c) Darrelle makes $10.50 in profit per bracelet.
Danica makes $3.50 in profit per bracelet
Since Darrelle and Danica work the same amount of time, we have to find the relationship between their profit, the number of bracelets produced and the time.
Profit for Darrelle for 'a' number of bracelet product = $10.50 × a = $10.50a
Profit for Danica per 'b' number of bracelet product = $3.50 × b = $3.50b
Let P = total profit made by both
P = $10.50a + $3.50b
Relationship of profit in terms of time spent in production when they work same amount of time:
P = $10.50(3/4 ×t)+ $3.50(5/2 × t)
P = 16.625t
When P = $500, t = ?
500 = 10.50(3/4 ×t)+ 3.50(5/2 × t)
500 = 7.875t + 8.75t
500 = 16.625t
t = 30.075 hours
It will take 30.075 hours for the whole business to make at least $500 profit