Carl Jung work would Penelope likely cite to explain the observation.
Option D
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
There is frequent appearance of some characters, though the fact that the cultures Penelope is studying had little or no connection with each other. So, its most likely that Penelope would refer to Carl Jung's concept of archetypes, as he has been associated with such similarities.
As Jung states, these archetypes are collective unconscious of the common content that is being observed. Such common contents have their different appearance in myths, dreams, art, and stories. Also, such characters appear in literature and can be traced back to myths such as the hero.
The behavior that the EMT would recognize as <u>uncharacteristic </u>of a conscious and stable 2-year-old boy who fell and hurt his hand is <u>D) Does not cry or protest </u>when taken from his mother.
<h3>Who is the EMT?</h3>
The EMT means an Emergency Medical Technician.
The emergency medical technician (EMT) is a medical professional who gives emergency care to people who are still outside of or on their way to the hospital.
Many EMTs provide emergency medical services in ambulances, stations, and special-need shelters.
Thus, it is <u>uncharacteristic </u>of a conscious and stable 2-year-old boy who fell and hurt his hand <u>not to cry or protest </u>when taken from his mother.
Learn more about EMT services at brainly.com/question/13112051
#SPJ1
<h3>Question Completion with Answer Options:</h3>
A) Apologizes several times for falling and hurting his hand
B) Cries any time you or your female partner touch him
C) Becomes upset when you lift his shirt to assess his abdomen
D) Does not cry or protest when taken from his mother
They are called the protestants because they protest and question the catholic faith which they do not seem to agree with
Answer:
<h3>Testify about what she personally observed.</h3>
Explanation:
In most of the court cases, witnesses may be called upon to testify in the court and sometimes the witnesses find it <u>hard to mete out what they witnessed exactly due to lack of precise observation and understanding of what was taking place.</u>
During such situations, the witnesses can simply testify what they personally observed or heard <u>without any considerations to the technicalities.</u> Similarly, Heidi, a witness for the plaintiff Gloria, who is not an expert in the matter about which she is being asked can testify about what <u>she personally observed.</u>