Answer: [D] Southern colonies and Middle colonies
Explanation:
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no hay opciones o incisos para responder, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
El antecedente históricos del conflicto entre Argentina y el Reino Unido con respecto a las Malvinas fue el siguiente.
Ambos países, Argentina y Gran Bretaña, reconocían a las Malvinas como su territorio. Los Ingleses afirmaban que ellos lo habían descubierto y les pertenecía. Por otro lado, Argentina decía que por su proximidad geográfica con el territorio Argentino y la lejanía de las Malvinas de Inglaterra, esas islas debían pertenecer a la Argentina.
El conflicto escaló y llegó hasta la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU), quien reconoció ese territorito como en disputa internacional.
Cabe mencionar que hasta ese momento, Gran Bretaña era quien administraba esas islas.
Por esa razón, Argentina decidió invadir las Malvinas en abril de 1982, acto que hizo que Inglaterra mandara a su flota Naval para recuperar las Malvinas.
La Marina Británica desembarcó en las islas en 21 de mayo de 1982, y se inició la guerra con la Batalla de San Carlos.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
Supply-side economics holds that increasing the supply of goods translates to economic growth for a country. In supply-side fiscal policy, practitioners often focus on cutting taxes, lowering borrowing rates, and deregulating industries to foster increased production.
