The statement The syntax used in these lines reflects the argument of the speaker. So the answer is option 3. The correct answer is option 3 because option 2 is not correct because it has effects on the speaker and reader.
When could is used it refers to an ability that <span>a person generally had in the past or to something that was generally possible in the past, can is present.
I could wash the dishes for you. (having the ability to do it)
I can wash the dishes for you. (its actually going to be done)
hope this helps you! :-)</span>
<span>It is clear that the French society viewed the war as being one of difficulty and hardship, despite the fact that the noblemen did not have to sacrifice their lives for the cause. This was a clear portrayal of differentiation in mentality among the French society during this era.</span>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
With the appearance of the wolves at the end of the story, the author left an open ending but suggests the end of the conflict between the two men, too. They wanted to kill each other and the wish becoming reality in a twisted way because the wolfs will kill them, as the author concludes with the happiness of Ulrich because of his hate to Georg and desire to saw him dead, even if the wolves murder him too.
