I will be discussing my relationship with a friend and what dialectical tensions we faced altogether. So, when I first met this friend, he was a complete stranger to me and we met in a local market accidentally where our shopping bags got exchanged. We met officially to exchange bags and then got to know each other in a formal discussion. Soon, that bonding developed but there was still uncertainty about this bond
(Predictability/novelty). There was some bizarre tension in my mind to ask him out to meet again but then again it was a kind of some uncomfortable pull that didn't let me do it. When I got to know him better I soon realized that he was too open about his things and experiences and I could not be open the same way about my life(Openness/closeness). Another tension suddenly which we faced was to connect properly and that too how to maintain a bond since we shared quite a bunch of things such as the interest in similar books, TV shows, etc (Autonomy/connectedness).
Learn more about relationships here
brainly.com/question/10286547
#SPJ4
Consular officers secretary of state, ambassadors, secretary of defense secretary of state, undersecretaries of state, <span>undersecretaries of state</span>
I believe the answer is: unconditional positive regard
unconditional positive regard refers to a concept of therapy that conducted by accepting and providing support for whatever the patient says or does.
This concept is used to make the patient believe that the therapy is a safe environment for them where they can truly be themselves without facing any judgement.<span />
The correct answer is "students' ability to master whatever they seek to learn". This is the only option that states a truly motivating experience, since the ability to master whatever someone wants is believing in yourself which ultimately leads to motivation. Multiple studies have proved that students positive thoughts lead to better grades through motivation.