I think it’s a Driving task mate
Answer:caretaker, lost, third party, lost, fails, conversion, incentives, abandoned, trespassing, abandoned
Explanation:A person who finds mislaid property does not obtain title to the goods, but rather becomes a __caretaker ________ of those goods.
A person who finds ___lost ___ property must return it to the owner if that person can be found, but has better claim to the property than a ___third party______. If the finder of ____lost ___ property knows the true owner, but ______fails ___ to return the property to him or her, the finder may be guilty of the tort of conversion________ . Estray statutes provide ______incentives ______ for finders to report their discoveries. A person who finds abandoned _____ property becomes the true owner of that property unless he or she finds it while __trespassing _______. A true owner of mislaid or lost property who gives up any further attempt to find has _abandoned ________ the property.
A. criminal law is by agencies while civil law is by congress
You cannot flush a toilet halfway or shoot a rifle quietly. like the potential for an action, shooting, and toilet flushing are examples of All or None law a(n) response.
<h3>What is the all-or-nothing rule for nerve cells?</h3>
Law of All-or-None for Muscles and Nerves. According to the all-or-none law, the strength of a nerve cells or a muscle fiber's response is not influenced by the stimulus's intensity. A nerve or muscle fiber will activate if a stimulus is present above a predetermined threshold.
<h3>What is the origin of the contractionary law of all or none?</h3>
The first illustration of the all-or-none law was made in 1871 by physiologist Henry Pickering Bowditch. He explained, "An induction shock creates a contraction or fails to do so according to its power; if it does so at all, it causes the strongest contraction," in his illustrations of the withdrawal of the heart muscle.
Learn more about All or none law:
brainly.com/question/11113072
#SPJ4
Answer: Stress and coping.
Explanation:
The stress and coping paradigm suggest that stress is a distinct relationship between someone and the context that is evaluated by that individual as too demanding and possibly dangerous to their well-being. This model requires not only the consideration of stressors, as environmental demands but also the judgments and coping resources the person has to deal with those demands.
