Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
1980 was the time at the end (but people didn't know that) of the Cold War, that is the conflict between Capitalism and Communism,
US had a capitalist system and was actively involved in stopping the spread of Communism in Asia and Latin America and this is also the correct answer: stopping the spread of Communism.
Crew of Dutch explorer Abel Tasman
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
A. As per the case Tyler has been going out to parties at his own will so it is not an outward conflict.
B. In the given case Tyler has no extra duties to perform so we cannot say he is suffering from overload.
C. As per the given case we cannot say he is having unhealthy food because no such statement in the given case evident that.
D. Tyler has been inconsistent as he always chooses party over practice, his behavior has been careless towards his goals.
The took the heavy guns from a captured fort and hauled them back to Boston. They took position on the surrounding hills. With there guns and strategic position they would be able to win. The British general was left with one option really. withdraw... <span />
