Answer:
a
Explanation:
I'm guessing and tell me if I got it right
I believe that humans are similar to animals, just more advanced. According to General Zaroff, the only thing that destinguishes humans from animals is the ability to reason. When he explains why he believed humans were the most dangerous game, he states, "It must have courage, cunning, and, above all, it must be able to reason."
In my personal experience, humans are similar to animals due to social structures and instincts. As much as we like to think humans are civil, almost everything humans do is for survival, just like animals. I also agree with Rainsford when he states at the beginning of the story that the world "is made of hunters and huntees." That logic applies to both humans and animals, and it creates balance in the world.
In this excerpt from President Kennedy of the 1963 Civil Rights Address, he emphasizes his point most by using anaphora to emphasize the lack of equality. Anaphora is a literary and rhetorical device that consists of the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of sentences or clauses. It is used to underscore the importance of certain ideas and to inspire, encourage or motivate the audience. Because of the repetition, it is likely to be remembered long since. In this excerpt, the President repeats "<em>It ought to be possible</em>", as a way of saying that equality has to be a civil right for <em>all Americans</em>.
Answer: All right, here goes nothing. *cracks knuckles*
To begin with, the article has a weak claim. While it does vaguely introduce their stance on the topic, it poses it as a question and not a statement. Also, this claim is written in the first person, unlike strong claims that are supposed to be written in the third person. As for the "support" section, even the very beginning strays from the original claim, instead saying why <em>they </em>should own a pet instead of why <em>everyone</em> should be allowed to own pets. For example, in the second paragraph, the author cites a story from a friend of a friend. That is not valid evidence. If it was on the news, however, and the author cited that as evidence instead, the article would be much stronger. The author also delves deeper into their own personal life instead of stating facts as they should have. The transition between paragraphs is clunky at best, with the third paragraph pretty much restating the claim instead of simply saying something like "Pets are helpful to our society." And finally, the entire purpose of that last sentence seems to be to wrap up the article in a hasty fashion, without any attention to restating the claim or the facts presented.
Hope this meets the criteria! Good luck!!
So uh- I looked this up and um maybe u could.. try suck the spiders up in a vacuum cleaner if possible, and empty the vacuum cleaner? and then empty it outside maybe.. lol- sorry if this isn't helpful i tried T-T i'm scared of spiders- so yeah