Stakeholder impact analysis is a five step process that allows managers to better understand and address stakeholders' needs.
Stakeholder impact analysis is a five steps process. Stakeholder impact analysis allows the manager to address the stakeholders’ needs and understand them better.
Stakeholder impact analysis is five steps process that allows managers to understand the need of their stakeholders. A stakeholder is any entity either person or organization, who is directly or indirectly affects the organization or its project.
The five steps of stakeholder impact analysis are:
- Identify the stakeholder: At this step, managers identify who are their stakeholders that are directly or indirectly affected by their projects, products, or services.
- The interest of the stakeholder: This step defines the interest of the stakeholder
- Opportunities and threats associated with stakeholders: this defines the present opportunities and threats to stakeholders
- Our responsibilities to stakeholders: This process defines that what is our legal, ethical, economic, and philanthropic responsibilities to our stakeholders
- Effectively address the stakeholders’ concerns: This step forces to take action to effectively address the stakeholders’ concerns.
You can learn more about stakeholder at brainly.com/question/15532995
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em><u>Sales prospecting is what it sounds like: Sifting through a mountain of businesses and individuals to uncover the prospects who are most likely to convert into paying customers with a little effort, like a miner panning for gold. Like prospecting for gold, it takes a lot of time.</u></em>
<em>#CarryOnLearning</em><em> </em>
Answer:
A. He has made several significant contributions to the areas of organizational learning and change.
Explanation:
<em>Option B</em>: Peter Drucker was the first person to discuss MBO, not Peter Senge. So, this option is incorrect.
<em>Option C</em>: It is the function of management. Therefore, Peter Senge might contribute to this one, but there is no evidence. So, it is wrong.
<em>Option D</em>: Peter Senge advocated the scientific methods of management, but not for the determination of efficient production.
<em>Option E</em>: He does not contend with the bureaucratic structure. Therefore, it is wrong, either.
<em>Option A</em>: It is the answer because he has made several contributions to the areas of organizational learning through the establishment of the society of organizational learning.
The direct write off does not report about the bad debt and does not use the allowance where as the allowance method uses the allowance for doubtful accounts because it provides an estimate for the same.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The allowance method speaks to the accumulation and accrual basis of bookkeeping and is the acknowledged technique to record uncollectible records for monetary bookkeeping purposes. The direct write off method is utilized just when we choose a client won't pay.
The allowance method utilizes the stipend for doubtful records to catch amassed assessments of awful obligations. The direct write-off method does not report bad debt estimates; therefore, it does not use the allowance for doubtful accounts when reporting bad debts.
