Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
The behavior of Albert is consistent with the law of demand.
The basic law of demand says that the higher the price of a commodity, the lower the quantity demanded; and the lower the price of a commodity, the higher the quantity demanded.
Albert went to his local store, hoping to buy a pair of Levi's for $30, however, when he got there, the price was lower at $18, he then decided to buy more than one because the price was lower. This is the law of demand taking place.
<span>The answer is comarketing arrangement. It is a partnership
between two or more companies where both companies cooperatively market each
other's products. For example, a company who manufacturers video cards may
partner with a game software company, and both companies will market each
other's related product.</span>
customers are always right
don't argue with the customers
don't switch to tags
