Answer: The judicial branch had supported their position.
Explanation: As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court because they felt that why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it.
The Supreme Court ruled that The Native Americans were “domestic dependent nations,” subject to the United States as a ward to a guardian. The territory was part of the United States but not subject to action by individual states. However, the missionaries encouraged them to stand fast. When the Native Americans read Marshall’s decision, they had honestly believed that the Nation had won the case, that Georgia lacked authority to control their lives and property, and that the courts would protect them.
Answer:
Explanation:
For years afterward, the United States celebrated Armistice Day on Nov. 11 to mark the end of the war. Then in 1954, the holiday was renamed Veterans Day to commemorate veterans of all wars.
Hope this helps
Explanation:
<em>Any</em><em> </em><em>four</em><em> </em><em>differences</em><em> </em><em>between</em><em> </em><em>stupa</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em>;</em>
- <em>Stupa</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>mainly</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>Buddhist</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>architecture</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em> </em><em>Shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>mainly</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>architecture</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>hindu</em><em>.</em>
- <em>The</em><em> </em><em>stupa</em><em> </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>single</em><em> </em><em>towering</em><em> </em><em>but</em><em> </em><em>shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>has</em><em> </em><em>many</em><em> </em><em>towering</em><em>. </em>
- <em>Various</em><em> </em><em>Buddhist</em><em> </em><em>statues</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>kept</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>where</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>various</em><em> </em><em>gods</em><em> </em><em>atatues</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>kept</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em>. </em>
- <em>Most</em><em> </em><em>Buddhist</em><em> </em><em>use</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>meditate</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>perform</em><em> </em><em>religious</em><em> </em><em>performance</em><em> </em><em>whereas</em><em> </em><em>hindus</em><em> </em><em>use</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>shikhar</em><em> </em><em>style</em><em> </em><em>architecture</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>performing</em><em> </em><em>various</em><em> </em><em>religious</em><em> </em><em>performance</em><em>. </em>
<em>hope</em><em> </em><em>it helps</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
<em>Respect</em><em> </em><em>Nepalese</em><em> </em><em>architecture</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>love</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em>.</em>
According to the philosopher Hobbes, what humans need most would be security.
He argued that security is a concept or something which the human species needs drastically in order to be able to function properly. This of course has many different opposing views, however, it was a view of Hobbes that this was the case.
Answer:
Victim of quid pro quo harassment.
Explanation:
QUID PRO QUO HARASSMENT occurs in the workplace when a manager or other authority figure like the supervisors offers or merely hints that he or she will give the employee something (a raise or a promotion) in return for that employee's satisfaction of a sexual demand. This also occurs when a manager or other authority figure says he or she will not fire or reprimand an employee in exchange for some type of sexual favor.
For instance, a male bank manager interviewing a female applicant for a job as a teller places his hand on her thigh. When she objects, he asks, "Don't you want this job?" The implication is that she must comply with the hiring manager's advances in order to get hired just as in the case of Sarah which involved David her supervisor promising her a raise, or a promotion in exchange for a sexual demand.
