Answer:
the aids crisis
Explanation:
everyone had aids and the government ignored it
The answer is A. Developed extensive trade networks
Answer:
Because of the ”domino affect’‘ since Germany is somewhat near Russia and eastern Europe, Germany spread their ideology of communism and it spread unto Russia
Explanation:
Domino affect
The Spanish influence improved Aztec civilisation by introducing new ideas and technologies. They shared European agricultural techniques, domestic animals, sugar cane, wheat, and more with the Aztecs. The Spanish conquest was noteworthy because it put a stop to the Aztecs' ritualized killing of human beings. This is further explained below.
<h3>The Aztecs and the Conquistadores?</h3>
Generally, The Spanish colonization of Mexico and the subsequent fall of the Aztec Empire are variously referred to as the "Conquest of Mexico" or simply "the Spanish."
In conclusion, On August 13, 1521, Cortes was able to overcome Cuauhtemoc's resistance at Tenochtitlan with the support of the Aztecs' local enemies. It is estimated that 240,000 Aztecs perished in the city's capture, marking the end of the empire.
Read more about Aztecs
brainly.com/question/11253411
#SPJ1
Answer:
A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.
Explanation:
Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law
.
Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.
