1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aliya0001 [1]
3 years ago
6

Which would most likely fall under the original jurisdiction of the supreme court

History
2 answers:
Tpy6a [65]3 years ago
4 0
A case between two states. Hope that helps.
Eva8 [605]3 years ago
3 0

Generally, a dispute between two states comes under the category of the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

Further Explanation:

According to Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in <em><u>“all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls,”</u></em> and in cases to which a state is party. Hence, under original jurisdiction, the Supreme Court ought to hear cases involving states or representatives of foreign nations.

The Supreme Court in the United States is an appellate body, which is authorized to hear disputes related to the American constitution, laws and treaties. It also hears disputes involving the United States, between states or between citizens of different states of the country, and in cases involving admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. Under original jurisdiction, the Supreme Court functions as a trial court.

In practice however, the Supreme Court rarely hears cases coming under the category of its original jurisdiction, as majority of the cases heard by it involves those coming under the subject of appellate jurisdiction. Under original jurisdiction, the Supreme Court generally hears cases involving two or more states of the country, as well as different citizens of different states of the country. In this context, it has generally heard and decided on cases where states have had disputes involving boundaries and water sharing. It has rarely heard cases involving officials of other nations.

Learn more:

1. In the case roe v. wade, the supreme court ruled that state laws. brainly.com/question/10483664

2. the supreme court is best characterized as  brainly.com/question/4840499

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: The Courts

Keywords: Article III, Section 2, appellate body, admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, trial court, boundaries and water sharing .

You might be interested in
In what ways was the Declaration affected by other nations or did the declaration affect other nations?
sergey [27]

Answer:

All men are created equal All men have the rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The government is created to protect these rights The people can change the government if the government become destructive and does not protect the peoples rights.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
is nation's policy of extending it's authority over other countries by political, economic or military means​
Andrew [12]

Answer:

<h2>Imperialism</h2>

Explanation:

Imperialism aims to create an "empire" of sorts, whereby a nation exercises authority or control over other countries in other parts of the world.  Imperialism was pursued by European nations and by the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.  Gaining control or influence over territories, particularly in Africa and Asia, was seen as important to a nation's power and prestige.  The most prominent example of US imperialism was the role the United States played in the Philippines.

4 0
3 years ago
What is churchill trying to persuade all of great britain to do?
amm1812
That they should support the war and not give up
8 0
4 years ago
What is one way that the American Revolution contributed to the start of the
dem82 [27]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The American Revolution was very expensive on the French which caused King Louie XVI to increase taxes, people became very poor and could barely afford to eat which led to the French Revolution.

7 0
4 years ago
Why did it take such a long time for the United States to respond to reports of death camps?
oee [108]

Answer:

Explanation:

They went to the nazi camps in years 1942-1945 so they took about a year to respond

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Do regions unite or divide
    10·2 answers
  • The Roman fort of Chesters is an excellent example of _____.
    8·2 answers
  • The policy of ______ allowed Germany to violate the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, while doing nothing to stop it.
    10·1 answer
  • What was the significance of Mao Zedong’s slogan “Let a hundred flowers bloom, and a hundred schools of thought contend”?
    6·1 answer
  • Is Yawo D'almeida President Of Togo ?
    15·2 answers
  • Why do you think "Slavery" is important in America? Explain with your own words.
    6·1 answer
  • Hiiii! Plz help me^^
    15·2 answers
  • Which of these statements about media coverage are accurate?
    10·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST!
    5·1 answer
  • The Camp David Accords, negotiated by President Carter, were significant becasue they led to -
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!