Answer:
$5,500,000
Explanation:
Total fair value of the options = Number of shares in the option × Estimated fair value per option = 1,000,000 × $5.50 = $5,500,000
Therefore, the total compensation indicated by these options would be $5,500,000.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Purchasing power is related to real income and not to nominal income. Even though workers had a $10 increase in their average nominal income, due to the effects of inflation, that increase does not necessarily reflect an improve in purchasing power.
The statement is false.
I think the answer is Strong leadership, because you can’t have a good event without the right evader
Answer:
each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss. This is an equal share for each policy and is due to them having the pro rata liability clause. This clause states that a policy is only liable for an equal percentage of the loss if the insurer has other policies from other companies. As in this case.
It is an example of an intrinsic reward.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The occurrence given above is a case of AN INTRINSIC REWARD.
There are two types of remuneration, inborn and extraneous prize. An inborn prize is a sort of remuneration which is by and by picked up when one accomplishes a by and by set objective. An intrinsic reward is close to the individual who is occupied with a specific action.
For example, in the situation given over, the natural prize is the fulfillment and the satisfaction which Casey feels. An extraneous prize is a sort of remuneration that is given to one by a more significant position authority because of good execution.
