Answer:
Typically, the British Government will set up the big picture regarding on which direction India should turn into. The Indian rulers who were under the influence of the British government have the power to navigate it by their own since they have better understanding on Indian's culture and people's characteristics.
In order to control the country as a whole, The British Government signed several treaties, military agreement, and trading terms with independent states of India. But, the agreements generally only beneficial for the nobles at the top of the hierarchy but have devastating effect toward the people. The increase on wealth received by the rulers made them became the British' puppet and made them inclined to follow The order from the British government.
Answer:
In the late 1950s and early 1960s conservatives were widely dismissed as "kooks" and "crackpots" with no hope of winning political power. In 1950 the literary critic Lionel Trilling spoke for a generation of scholars and journalists when he wrote that "in the United States at this time liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition.... It is the plain fact [that] there are no conservative or reactionary ideas in general circulation" but only "irritable mental gestures which seem to resemble ideas." The historian Richard Hofstadter echoed Trilling's assessment, arguing that the right was not a serious, long-term political movement but rather a transitory phenomenon led by irrational, paranoid people who were angry at the changes taking place in America.
Explanation:
They where based on human reason, they believed that humans had wisdom.
Thing were always passed down from one to another
