Answer:
Dred Scott v Sanford
Explanation:
In <u>Dred Scott v Sanford</u>, the Supreme Court justices determined that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights.
In the Dred Scott v Sanford case, Dred Scott a black American who had lived an a territory were slavery had been banned sued for his freedom arguing that since he had lived in illinois and Wisconsin, both free territory, he was a free man. However, the court ruled that he was still a slave, the Supreme court corroborated the ruling of the lesser court that he was still a slave and therefore had no legal right and cannot sue.
Answer:
Congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate. (Usually an act is passed with a simple majority.) This check prevents the President from blocking an act when significant support for it exists.
Explanation:
Answer
Jeśli ćwiczysz w domu, to jest w porządku, ale nie widzę tego pytania
Answer: D. No, because the state owns and operates the metal plant.
Explanation:
The State owns and operates the plants and so is allowed to discriminate against non residents.
This principle was established by the United States Supreme Court in Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, 447 U.S. 429 (1980).
In the judgement, the Court held that South Dakota had a right to give it's residents preferential treatment in buying cement from a state owned plant.
These kinds of delusion is known as being:
paranoid
When a person is being paranoid, he or she can not stop thinking of negative happenings or thoughts that may happen to him or her. These type of persons are suffering from the mental condition commonly known as paranoia
Thus, the answer is:
paranoid
