1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WITCHER [35]
3 years ago
8

Who were the two groups of the senate that reviewed the treaty?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Kay [80]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Irreconcilables were bitter opponents of the Treaty of Versailles in the United States in 1919. Specifically, the term refers to about 12 to 18 United States Senators, both Republicans and Democrats, who fought intensely to defeat the ratification of the treaty by the Senate in 1919.

Explanation:

lara31 [8.8K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Irreconcilables were bitter opponents of the Treaty of Versailles in the United States in 1919. Specifically, the term refers to about 12 to 18 United States Senators, both Republicans and Democrats, who fought intensely to defeat the ratification of the treaty by the Senate in 1919.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What can humans do to make the renewable forest resources last longer? ap environmental science
Lady_Fox [76]

Answer: Reducing the use of forest resources can enable humans to make it last longer.

Explanation: A reduction of the use of forest resources can help with the mitigation process. Mitigation can be defined as the reduction of the loss during any natural disaster. Forest is a rich source of oxygen, so we have to be very careful about the conservation of forest resources. It also serves numerous others functions like it can be use as shelter for different animals and birds. We have to minimize the uses of forest products.

3 0
2 years ago
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court: Group of answer choices overturned the lower court conviction of a Socialist. ru
Nikitich [7]

Answer:

In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>

Explanation:

In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.

This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.

Thus, the correct answer is the second option.

6 0
2 years ago
Under the Articular of Confederation, who had the final authority? A)Congress B)The states C)The President D)The Kind NEED HELP
Sever21 [200]

Answer:

A)Congress  Congress was given the authority to make treaties and alliances, maintain armed forces

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a society composed of?​
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:In sociological terms, society refers to a group of people who live in a definable community and share the same culture. On a broader scale, society consists of the people and institutions around us, our shared beliefs, and our cultural ideas. Typically, more-advanced societies also share a political authority.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Sporre argues that the values of which era encouraged the division of the fine and applied arts?
ira [324]

According to Sporre, it was during the 18th century that a differentiation between fine art and applied art began to take shape.

This distinction can be traced back to philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau who argued that there is an inherent difference in talent between artists who paint landscapes versus those who create portraits or figure sketches.

<h3>When was the separation of the fine and applied arts encouraged?</h3>

In the 18th century, Sporre argues that the values of an era encouraged the division of fine and applied arts.

He states that during this time period, people were more interested in practical applications than artistically-oriented endeavors.

This was due to advances made in science and technology, which allowed for things like machines, weapons, transportation systems etc to be developed and manufactured.

As a result of this emphasis on practicality, art became less important as it did not immediately have utilitarian value.

Taking account of both aesthetic and functional aspects simultaneously became something considered innovative or even daring which set the scene for later developments within the fine arts such as symbolism and abstractionism.

To learn more about  applied and fine arts, visit:

brainly.com/question/14339622

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a result of language convergence?
    6·2 answers
  • What would happen to earth without wind and water?
    11·1 answer
  • Civil disobedience is the idea that citizens should overthrow their government with violent means when the government does not r
    7·1 answer
  • paste three articles from newspapers,magazines or internet which are about negative impacts on individuals rights in a democrati
    14·1 answer
  • Can y’all help me again and THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • Which county government system most resembles the structure of the federal government? A. the mayor-council system B. the superv
    9·1 answer
  • In the United States criminal court system, defendants are?
    8·1 answer
  • Can Someone check my answer please ( my answer is A) FIRST PERSON TO ANSWER WILL GET A BRAIN LIST FIVE STARS AND A THANK YOU!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • True or False: Weaving is a common clue to law enforcement that a driver is impaired. False True Submit answer
    14·1 answer
  • When an area is densely populated what does that mean?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!