Answer:
C. skimming
Explanation:
Based on the information provided it is safe to say that by setting the price at $12,700 Xerox used a skimming pricing strategy. This is a pricing strategy in which the firm/company places their new product in the market with the highest price they can give it and go slowly lowering the price as time goes on. This is mostly done with brand new, one of a kind products that do not have competition, like the portable fax machine that Xerox designed.
Answer:
The price per share should be $22.5
Explanation:
The price earnings multiple or P/E tells us how much price the investors are willing to pay for $1 earnings of the company.
We first need to calculate the earnings per share of the company.
Earnings per share = Net Income / Number of outstanding common shares
Earnings per share = 1500000 / 1000000 = $1.5 per share
Using the P/E for the industry, the price per share of Flintstone should be,
P/E = Price per share / Earnings per share
15 = Price per share / 1.5
15 * 1.5 = Price per share
Price per Share = $22.5
The answer is A. Providing legal advice
Answer:
planning; marketing plan
Explanation:
The planning phase is the second phase of any activity. It is basically made after analysis of all the problems and opportunities.
Planning phase basically aims at organizing the techniques for achieving the aims. This aims for planning phase to achieve the sales and set targets for gaining maximum performance in marketing. This sets all the strategies and policies for marketing.
Answer:
The president of Riggs has missed something.
She should make the Sail instead of buying because its cheaper to manufacture than purchasing it outside.
Explanation:
<u>Cost of Manufacturing the Sails:</u>
Direct materials $93
Direct Labor $83
Total $173
The president of Riggs has included the $90 overhead based on $78,000 of annual fixed overhead that is allocated using normal capacity in the cost of manufacturing the sail which is incorrect.
Riggs Company is operating at 80 % of full capacity, hence utelizing the 20% excess capacity would not expand its fixed costs.
Thus said the current fixed cost are irrelevent for this decison and would be incurred whether or not Riggs Company utilizes the excess capacity
<u>Conclusion:</u>
The cost of making the sail is $173 which is lower than the cost of buying them at $ 258.
I would advise The president of Riggs to make the sail by utilizing the excess capacity since its cheaper than purchasing it outside.
