The Dred Scott vs. Sandford case was monumental in America, as it stated that slaves had no rights which their owners were bound to respect. Along with this, it also stated that slaves are property and can be brought into free states.
This case causes significant divide between the nation. The southern states and those individuals with slaves see this as a victory, as they can now take their slaves wherever they want without the fear of these individuals becoming free men. On the other hand, abolitionists and states who outlawed slavery are furious. This is because they now have to allow slave owners to keep their slaves in a state where they do not want slavery. This case resulted in a bigger divide between those for slavery and those against slavery.
Answer:
Ang Digmaang Pilipino-Amerikano, 1899–1902. Matapos ang pagkatalo nito sa Digmaang Espanyol-Amerikano noong 1898, ipinasa ng Espanya ang matagal nang kolonya ng Pilipinas sa Estados Unidos sa Kasunduan sa Paris. ... Ang desisyon ng mga tagagawa ng patakaran ng Estados Unidos na isama ang Pilipinas ay hindi walang kontrobersya sa bahay.
Answer:
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy. During the fall and winter of 1838 and 1839, the Cherokees were forcibly moved west by the United States government. Approximately 4,000 Cherokees died on this forced march, which became known as the "Trail of Tears."
Explanation:
Conflict theorists argue that who uses the law in order to reinforce their place in society: <span>the powerful</span>
