14.603 rounded to the nearest whole number is 15.
Find the ones place (4). Look at the number next to the ones place. It is a 6. Because 6 is greater than 5, round up
15 is your answer
hope this helps
Answer:
Rapunzel's hair is approximately 1063 times longer now , than it was 10 years ago .
Step-by-step explanation:
Given as :
The length of Rapunzel's hair 10 years ago = 19 unit
The length of Rapunzel's hair after 10 years = 20193 unit
Let the number of times the length of his hair now than 10 years ago = x
So, According to question
∴ x times 19 = 20193
Or, x × 19 = 20193
Or, x =
I.e x = 1062.78
or, x = 1062.78 ≈ 1063 times
Hence Rapunzel's hair is approximately 1063 times longer now , than it was 10 years ago . answer
Answer: points B (4,7) and I (9,3)
If the inequalities are
y > −2x + 10 and y> (½)x -2
Step-by-step explanation: If I interpreted the inequalities correctly, the attached graph shows them. It is possible that you meant y > 1/(2x-2) for the second inequality. If so, we start over!
You can test the values for all the points, but it appears that (4,7) and (9,3) both work.
The other coordinates appear to be outside the solution -- the dark-shaded area.
I hope this is your Brainliest answer. It was a lot of work!
Because you seem to have an understanding of the material, I will write my math, but no explanations for my work. Comment on this answer for an explanation, or if I did something wrong.
1. Find the length of the South side of the field.
2.Find the perimeter of the pumpkin field.
3. Find the perimeter of the whole field.
4. If , what is the total perimeter?
Random Tangent:
If you want to involve in finding these answers for whatever reason, your math is going to get messy. Here's what I tried before I realized you could multiply each side by to get the total perimeter:
Now the other side. This one's even worse.
At this point, was realizing I wasn't going about the problem correctly, but did one last try by setting . At this point in the equation, I simply had to stop, both due to complexity and technological problems.
I could possibly continue to solve, but I don't see a point. It was clear that this was NOT the right path to take finding the perimeter. It was here I realized that I could just multiply the two sides without in them by and--without as much difficulty--reach the correct answer.
Answer: See below
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Yes
2. No
3.No
4. Yes
5. No
6. Yes
7. No
8. No
9. Yes