Answer:
Among the options given on the question the answer is option C.
rising life expectancy
Explanation:In the early 20th century the United States was experiencing the decline of birth rate. There were many reasons behind this. Like as world war I, the Great depression effect in the economy. But after world war II, USA experienced a great increase in the birth rate during the period of 1946 to 1964. This period is called as the Baby Boom in the history of USA. By the end of 1964, 76.6 million babies were born during the period of baby boom.
There are many reasons behind this massive increase of birth rate. Life expectancy was one of the main reason behind this. The strengthened economical condition of the USA has increased the facilities of the people. As a result couples were more willing to have babies.
Moreover soldiers returned from the world war were given the opportunity of job and social securities.As a result they got married inthe pursue of better and fulfill life. 2.2 millions couple were married in 1946 and most of them were strongly inspired to have baby to accomplish the family.
So it can be said that rising life expectancy was a factor behind the Baby Boom.
I believe that it is C) deka. I think this because deci is worth .1, and milli is worth .001. Deka is worth 10.
Sports personalities are portrayed as public properties, by the media. Their every move, personal life etc., are disclosed by the media. Their life becomes public, and one single negative news about them brings about backlash from the public.
Media should not infringe the personal space of the sportsperson.
Media should not exaggerate the loss of the sportsperson, in any game.
Media should support the sportsperson, and not create their negative image.
Media should help the sportsperson, who have lesser funds, in obtaining sponsorships.
The evidence for the claim that campaign money buys influence and elected officials ignore voters to please donors is tenuous.
<h3>What is a tenuous claim?</h3>
This is the type of claim that people make that cannot be said to be strong, definite of have been made sure of. People just make these types of claims based on the things that they think even though it may not exactly be true.
The claim that campaign money buys influence is tenuous based on the fact that the claim has not being tested to be true. It was just made by the people without any concrete information that would serve as pointers for the reason for such a speech.
Read more on claim here: brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
