Answer:
Old Imperialism - large numbers of European settlers; acquisition of gold and trade goods; colonies in Americas; focus on the acquisition of land
New Imperialism - acquisition of raw materials; small numbers of European settlers; colonies in Africa and Asia;
Explanation:
The Old Imperialism and the New Imperialism have numerous things that distinguish them, including the goals of them, the migration of people, as well as the parts of the world where they were occurring. The Old Imperialism was focused on the Americas. Its goals were to to gain as much territory as possible, as well as gold and trade goods. The migration of Europeans during the Old Imperialism was immense, with millions of people moving in the colonies. The New Imperialism was focused on the territories in Africa and Asia. The goals were to exploit the raw materials, cheap labor force, and use them as market places. Very small migration from Europe occurred during the New Imperialism, as the mother nations were in much better condition and were developing rapidly.
The answer is C (the 3rd one)
Answer: The Umayyad dynasty undertook its administration work from Damascus while Abbasid did so from Baghdad. The fact that both caliphates managed their administration duties from their capital cities creates a common similarity between them two. Both Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates were made up of Sunni affiliated Muslims
Explanation:
Escalating the tensions that would lead to rebellion and war, the Mexican government imprisons the Texas colonizer Stephen Austin in Mexico City.
Stephen Fuller Austin was a reluctant revolutionary. His father, Moses Austin, won permission from the Mexican government in 1821 to settle 300 Anglo-American families in Texas. When Moses died before realizing his plans, Stephen took over and established the fledgling Texas community on the lower reaches of the Colorado and Brazos Rivers. Periodic upheavals in the government of the young Mexican Republic forced Austin to constantly return to Mexico City where he argued for the rights of the American colonists in Texas, representing their interests as a colonial founder. Yet, Austin remained confident that an Anglo-American state could succeed within the boundaries of the Mexican nation.
