By expressing and exploring ideas that are relevant to human growth, philosophy has historically contributed significantly to human civilization. Philosophy is currently in trouble and irrelevant; it has devolved into a way to blather, profit, and spin wheels. Philosophy nowadays essentially abdicates its responsibility.
I make this statement because we are already dealing with significant physical encroachments that predict a major catastrophe for civilisation. There are too many to list, such as avoidable famine, widespread religious fanaticism, and climate catastrophe. A systematic philosophical strategy to solve this situation is urgently needed now. It is necessary to formally look for a broad conceptual framework as a means of resolving our shared issues. If there are any philosophy programs in existence today, they are few and ineffective.
Searching for wisdom's specifics seems futile when it cannot be sustained. The majority of the many philosophical schools must find a way to shift away from emphasizing historical emergence and toward emphasizing empiricism and pragmatism. Today's schools of philosophy provide a value that appeases those who engage in play with 'intellectual' reaches and helps those who have made it their vocation make money.
One economic result of the Columbian exchange was: B. <span>development of a european dominated global trade network
After Chirstopher Columbus's voyage, more international trading route was found between American continent and European continent. The European empire use this knowledge to establish a Giant Gloval trade network between the two continents</span>
The Answer would be C.
Good Historians make a counterclaim
Hope this helps :)
Answer: diaries, correspondence, ships' logs
original documents e.g. birth certificates, trial transcripts
biographies, autobiographies, manuscripts
interviews, speeches, oral histories
case law, legislation, regulations, constitutions
government documents, statistical data, research reports
Correct answer:
<h2>A) Johnson explains the reason for US involvement, while Nixon explains the need to end the war.</h2>
Explanation:
President Lyndon Johnson's words are an illustration of "domino theory." Domino theory was the idea that the spread of communism in Vietnam would result in other countries in the region falling like dominoes to the influence of communism. During his administration, after obtaining the Gulf of Tonkin resolution from Congress, President Johnson escalated US involvement in the war and magnified the number of US troops there by hundreds of thousands. Between 1964 and the end of Johnson's presidency in 1969, US troop levels in Vietnam increased from around 20,000 to over 500,000
Read more about the Gulf of Tonkin resolution on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/12225803#readmore
President Richard Nixon had instituted a policy of "Vietnamization" in regard to the Vietnam War, which emphasized that the United States needed to empower South Vietnamese forces to assume more combat duties. He proposed drawing down US involvement in the war and seeking "peace with honor," as he put it. By the time that President Nixon and US policy shifted to this sort of policy, it was too late to stave off the victory of the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces. The US eventually withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973, and by 1975, Saigon (in South Vietnam) fell to the North Vietnamese communist forces.