Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
4+I-15I÷3
4+15÷3
4+5
9
The answer is 9
Answer:
(x, g(x)) = {(-2, -2), (0, 0), (2, 2), (4, -3), (6, -3)}
Step-by-step explanation:
The first three values of x in the table are all less than or equal to 2, so the first part of the function definition applies. The y-value is equal to the x-value. The ordered pairs are ...
(-2, -2), (0, 0), (2, 2)
The last two values of x in the table are more than 2, so the last part of the function definition applies. For those values of x, the y-value is -3. The ordered pairs are ...
(4, -3), (6, -3)
30,1416 I'm pretty sure this is the answer
From information given, we know
208 miles was at rate of 65 mph. so divide total mileage by speed to get time spent.
208 ÷ 65 = 3.2 hours
So the rest of the trip took 6 - 3.2 = 2.8hours to travel another 348 total miles minus the 208 miles driven at 65mph is 140 miles.
140 miles divided by 2.8 hours gives speed
140 ÷ 2.8 = 50 miles per hour
