Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
The correct answer to your question is glue
Answer: A. a paradigm shift,as it challenged the existing paradigm of the day
Explanation:
A paradigm shift is a major change that occurs in the practices and the concepts of how something works.
Since Ptolemy believed that the earth was at the center of the universe while Copernicus asserted the notion that the sun was at the center of the solar system. Thomas Kuhn would call this an example of paradigm shift.
