Eh eh , *claps*SAy WHat YO nAmE IsSExplanation:
The correct answer to this question is "<span>It is truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof."
</span>
The skulls of early human-like creatures were much larger in size than the skulls of modern-day humans. A historian most likely describe thisstatement by having it <span>truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof.</span>
Answer:
emphasized severally the treatment of Native Americans as individuals rather than as members of tribes?
Explanation:
I'm not sure what the possible answers are.
<span>The best way to determing who is approaching before seeing them is to rely on other senses. For example, if your uncle never showers then you might be able to smell him even if you can't see him coming. In some cases it may also be possible to tell who is approaching by relying on knowledge about their habits. For example, if someone is coming through the door at six o'clock, and your father usually comes by at that time, then that person is probably your father.</span>
Based on the description, <span>this experiment is most likely an </span>aversive conditioning Experiment.
Aversive conditioning experiment is created to associate a substance/behavior that wanted to be eliminated with some negative stimuli (such as pain or nausea). This will train the brain to reject the existence of that substance/behavior in our body.
