A tradeoff is a balance achieved between two desirable but incompatible feature. So the reasonable answer would be B
The most logical answer to me would be A, however I recommend you don’t go with my answer JUST YET because this is an educational guess. Take time to think about my answer. Sorry if it’s wrong
Based on the information given regarding the monopoly power, the remedy by the court will be<u> divesting itself of the control or ownership of</u><u> Child Shops</u>.
It should be noted that antitrust laws are put in place in order to protect consumers from business practices that are predatory and also ensure fair competition.
Since antitrust laws recommend the breaking of certain business conducts, there'll be the divesting of the company of the control or ownership of Child Shops.
Learn more about monopoly on:
brainly.com/question/13113415
Answer: Joint operating agreement
Explanation:
The joint operating agreement is one of the concept that helps in protecting the business or the industry from the failure that helps in governing the partnership between any two organization.
In this type of agreement any two organization are basically contributing their power and the resources for producing the effective result.
According to the given question, the newspaper industry is one of the example of joint operating agreement in which two companies are permitted for combining their business. Therefore, Joint operating agreement is the correct answer.
Answer:
we can look at this problem from 2 different point of views:
if you have francs and wish to buy pounds: then you take 12 francs and purchase 1 ounce of gold, and then you sell it for 6 pounds. This way you will only spend 2 francs per each pound instead of 2.2.
if you have pounds and want to make a gain: you take 6 pounds and purchase 13.2 francs and you then buy 1.1 ounces of gold. Then you sell the 1.1 ounces of gold in exchange for 6.6 pounds.
Any of the scenarios does not include any transaction prices nor shipping costs, it is only theoretical.
