Answer:
b. Organizational justice.
Explanation:
In reacting to the allegations that Google engages in "systematic compensation disparities against women" and the request of payroll records by the U.S. Department of Labor in 2017.
Google annually reviews pay levels and denies any disparities against women. In reviewing pay levels, Google's management is focused on organizational justice. The concept of organizational justice was first introduced by Greenberg in the year 1987.
Organizational justice is an organizational concept that describes an employee's perception of decisions, fairness, behaviors and actions with respect to how these employees are affected or influenced both psychologically and other wise at work.
Organisational justice deals with all workplace related activities, ranging from salary to relationships between superiors and their subordinates, equal rights, gender equality and even access to training and promotion.
For the purpose of trust, loyalty and progressive work attitudes, it is very important that organizations prioritize organizational justice.
Hence, if Google focuses on organizational justice, it will help to build trust and address the issue of pay level disparities among its employees.
The answer is online surverys!! Hope this helps
Being aware of one's expectations is to keep them in check and to ensure that they are realistic. This is one of the ways to practice <u>Effective Parenting.</u>
<h3>Dangers of Unrealistic Expectations</h3>
Some of the dangers of unrealistic expectations are:
- Friction
- misunderstandings
- frustrations
- damage to the self-esteem of the kids and stifle healthy mental development of the kids
See the link below for more:
brainly.com/question/5345351
Answer:
C. Neither Mary nor Sharon can claim breach of contract.
Explanation:
Mary buys a lottery ticket and promises to buy her friend Sharon a new pair of shoes if she checks the lottery results while Mary is away.
Sharon agrees to do so, provided she has the time for it.
If Sharon fails to check the results and Mary wins the lottery, then it would be true of the contract between Mary and Sharon that Neither Mary nor Sharon can claim breach of contract.
The reason is Mary's promise is based on the condition that Sharon checks the result, Sharon's promise is based on the condition that 'if she has the time for it.'
The condition was not met by Sharon hence she cannot claim a breach of contract because she did not check the results, similarly, Mary cannot sue Sharon because sharon made it clear that she will only check If she has the time.
