Thank you for posting your question here. It can be considered to be consistent with the given facts. As you know, an hypothesis, much less a theory, is never proven. It can be shown to be consistent with given observations. As new observations are collected, the given hypothesis may have to be modified.
If the celery became crisp when it was soaked in ice water, then clearly that the water has rehydrated the celery is a reasonable hypothesis. But did it have to be ice cold water? Would room temperature water work? What about boiling water?
And thus most of the time, the success of an hypothesis leads to the design of new experiments to test and expand the original hypothesis.
The scenario demonstrates the phenomenon cocktail party effect. This is where a person can focus on a thing with the use of his or her auditory senses even when the person is on another stimuli. To simplify, it is where a person can still focus on the person he or she is talking to despite with the noisy background. This is what Lauren's is demonstrating as she can focus on the passenger even if there are multiple announcements.
Answer:
Renaissance humanism was a revival in the study of classical antiquity, at first in Italy and then spreading across Western Europe in the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries. During the period, the term humanist referred to teachers and students of the studia humanitatis—meaning the humanities including grammar, rhetoric, history, poetry, and moral philosophy. It was not until the 19th century that this began to be called humanism instead of the original humanities, and later by the retronym Renaissance humanism to distinguish it from later humanist developments. During the Renaissance period most humanists were religious, so their concern was to "purify and renew Christianity", not to do away with it. Their vision was to return ad fontes to the simplicity of the New Testament, bypassing the complexities of medieval theology. Today, by contrast, the term humanism has come to signify "a worldview which denies the existence or relevance of God, or which is committed to a purely secular outlook".
<u>Answer:
</u>
The type of factor that probably plays a bigger role in determining whether a person will try a drug in the first place, as opposed to determining which of those who try it will become dependent is the social factor.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The behavior that a normal person exhibits is often controlled by various factors. One of those factors is the societal pressure that the person inevitably experiences.
- The choices that are made by an individual are often influenced by the thought pertaining to the acceptance that the people show towards the choice in general.
- Hence, the social factor plays a considerable role in determining whether a person will try a drug at all or not.
2 cells, 6 chromosomes in each.
