Answer:
The above statement is true .
Explanation:
It is true , when a company take decision to move its operations out of the country it will affect its employees , owners , suppliers , distributors , even its customers .
It is because, when company move out , the employees working in it loss their jobs . They become jobless. The suppliers loss their customer. The distributor also loss their customer. The customer may like the product of the company and if the company moves out then they do not get their product which they like. The owner may also suffer loss,as its possible that the product do not gain popularity anywhere else . The company may loss its share. It also effect the economy , as a good earning company always serves to a country .
Answer:
6:1
Explanation:
Net credit sales is $120,000
Account receivable is $20,000
Cash collection on credit sales is $100,000
.
Therefore the receivables turnover ratio can be calculated as follows
= 120,000/20,000
= 6:1
Hence receivable turnover ratio is 6:1
All of the above. Taxes are used for each of these.
Answer:
Supply side is the view point of the Firms or the Businesses.
Explanation:
As the law of demand deals with the consumers side, the law of supply deals with the suppliers or the firms/businesses.
this tries to explain the factors that affect the supply, such as the prices of the substitutes and complements, the price of a commodity itself, taxes, government subsidies, technological influences, etc...
in this question, the 1st option, consumer is wrong. However, in certain situations, Government can be acted as a "supplier" (if there is a government monopoly on the supply of a good or a service", and government is a heavy influencer of supply through the implementaion of taxes and subsidies!
Answer:
c. lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because they take the same amount of money from both poor and rich.
Explanation:
To understand this question, you have to first understand what lump-sum taxes are.
Lump-sum taxes are a system of taxes where everybody pays the same amount of tax no matter their economic status, or their actions. Basically, lump-sum taxes take the same amount of money from the rich and the poor, hugely increasing the burden on the poor and lessening that of the rich.
As an example, a lump-sum tax of $100 would require everybody to pay $100. To a person earning, say $120, that would be a huge hit, and be a huge burden on his normal life. However, to a rich person who earns, say, $10000, that would be much more easier for the rich person.
Hence, lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because of the unfair advantage the rich have over the poor in tax-paying.
Hope this helped!
