The Indian Removal Act took place in the first half of the 1800s under the presidencies of Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren and directly led to the Trail of Tears, which resulted in the death of many members of tribes in the American South. It was considered controversial because the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tribes' cause wherein the state of Georgia (which was actively seeking to evict the Indian inhabitants) was told it had no right to force their removal. Nevertheless, the president ordered their removal.
hope this helps! :)
Answer:
When they don't prioritise and seek individuals preservation.
Explanation:
Locke states that a government loses its rights to rule when they abuse they're power and use it in negative ways
Answer:
Permanent Legislative Paneslestablished.
Explanation:
In the United States Congress, standing committees are permanent legislative panelsestablished by the United States House of Representatives and United States Senate rules. ... Most standing committees recommend funding levels—authorizations—for government operations and for new and existing programs.
Not really. There was segregation still in the early 60s. Martin LK didn't make an appearance until his speech in 1963 and black people got the right to vote in 1965. Yet again, black people were still heavily judged and they were blamed for a lot of mistakes other people would make. So no. The white prison population was not higher.
Because the Americans knew that if they entered the war they would need a lot of money, lives would be lost, it was questionable what would happen with the political scene; whether the ruling party would still have the majority vote once it was all over, they would be more susceptible to attack, etc.
There are many factors to consider before deciding on entering a war.
