Answer:
I believe the answer to 1. is B, and Grare decisis means substantially the same. Basically based on a court's previous decision in a case, that same decision can be carried out and used in any future cases.
Explanation:
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
Answer:
Ms. Gardner could make the change during the Annual Election Period (AEP) or during the MA-Enrollment Period.
Explanation:
According to Medicare's enrollment guidelines, she could do this during the Annual Election Period (AEP) that runs from the 15th of October till the 7th of December.
Also, she could make such change during the MA Open Enrollment Period which takes place from the 1st of January till the end of March in each year.
Answer and Explanation:
1. The court's decision was that the press has the complete right to expose information from any government sector, including information related to the executive sector, even if that information were related and were in the possession of the president of the republic.
2. I agree with the court's decision, since government information must be exposed to the people who are the center of national politics. This prevents important information from being hidden from the public and that possible cases of corruption from proceeding and cannot be judged by popular opinion.
3. This case is important today because it guarantees the rights defended by the first amendment, ensuring that the press cannot be limited by the government and promoting the free exercise of information.
