Answer:
I think it is the middle one?
Explanation:
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was unfairly prejudicial. ... If an appeals court finds that the evidence against Emerly should have been excluded, she can receive a new trial.
Hope this helps
Self protection, mental disorder
The person did this so they had to kill them
They were defending themselves
