cause the bodies formed by the government by mentioning their function power and formation in the constitution. constitution plays a significant role in development of country.
Answer:
d. keep right of the median
Explanation:
A divided highway is type of roadways where there are two lanes in oppositely approaching vehicles and is separated by a concrete platform or strip of grass in order to separate the vehicles moving in opposite directions. This strip of concrete or grass in the middle of the highway to separate the traffic is called the medians.
In such highways, until and unless there is a sign or a traffic control device, a driving driving a vehicle always should drive right of the median.
Hence the correct option is (d).
Answer:
D. They had a rate of cognitive impairment several times higher than the children adopted at less than 6 months of age.
Explanation:
In the research study, titled "Child-to-adult neurodevelopmental and mental health trajectories after early life deprivation: the young adult follow-up of the longitudinal English and Romanian Adoptees study" using the data from the English and Romanian Adoptees study to assess whether deprivation-associated adverse neurodevelopmental and mental health outcomes persist into young adulthood.
It was concluded among other conclusions that regarding cognitive development for the children who were adopted when they were older than six months of age they had a rate of cognitive impairment several times higher than the children adopted less than six months of age.
Published on February 2017, the research study was carried out by Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke et al. It was summarily concluded that Time-limited, early-life exposures to institutional deprivation are factors characterized with disorders in childhood.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
