Yes u need to show the problem cuz there is not context to this question
Answer:
Ë
Step-by-step explanation:
Im literally going to poop my pants that is SO scawwwy. I deserve compensation for this. My lawyers are coming after you
Answer:
Yes, this is a valid inference because she took a random sample of the neighborhood.
Step-by-step explanation:
As we can see, Sue's survey was perfectly random and without any prejudice.
18% of the families, according to her research, would volunteer at the shelter. According to her, 18% of the local households should be required to volunteer at the animal shelter.
Therefore, given that she chose a representative sample of the area, her conclusion is valid.