This is not me fighting<span> against the </span>tide of history but being swept<span> along with it.
The word 'against' give clearer explanation on what the speaker is opposed to (in this case it's conventiional belief) and the word 'along' indicates that the speaker do not want to just simply follow what the majority of people tell him/her what to follow.</span>
Whats your question? id love to help but it doesnt seem like theres a question in what you posted.
You can download
the answer here
bit.ly/3gVQKw3
Fred went to Paris, Tom went to Europe and Mark went no where
The answer is mass. It is one of the principles of war which means to concentrate combat power at the decisive place and time. What it meant from the military perspective is that you bring together whatever forces are necessary to accomplish a desired result. An example would be moving forces from diverse locations to all take part in one set-up, such as the seaborne attack of Normandy in three locations with hundreds of ships coupled with airborne troops jumping behindhand enemy lines. The combination of the two achieved results far superior to either one, and if these pieces hadn't come together at the same time (bad weather during the channel crossing) or at the correct place (mistakes in the drop zone coordinates away from targets), the overall effect is weakened and could even lead to a non-victory: not necessarily a downfall but certainly a failure to accomplish the mission.
