1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
earnstyle [38]
3 years ago
6

A line contains the points (-5, 3) and (0, -7). What is the equation of this line in slope-intercept form?

Mathematics
2 answers:
pychu [463]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D. y = –2x – 7

Step-by-step explanation:

First, find the <em>rate</em><em> </em><em>of change</em><em> </em>[<em>slope</em>]:

-y₁ + y₂\-x₁ + x₂ = m

- \frac{3 - 7}{5 + 0} = -\frac{10}{5} = -2

In this case, the y-intercept of [0, -7] is ALREADY given to you, so we would not have to go further in this case.

I am joyous to assist you anytime.

Oxana [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the answer is D

and don't take this as your answer I just guessed but get people who are master's at answering this

Step-by-step explanation:

(-5+3)_(0- (-7)

y=-2x-7

You might be interested in
Please help (CORRECT ANSWERS ONLY)
german

-2(8m+8) = -16

-16m - 16 = -16

His first mistake lies in his distribution. When multiplying -2 * 8, he made it a positive 16, when he should have made it a negative 16.

-16m - 16 = -16

Add 16 to each side.

-16m = 0

Divide that by -16

m = 0

7 0
4 years ago
Not sure if any of this is correct, but it’s what I got so far
Irina18 [472]

Problem 1 is correct. You use the pythagorean theorem to find the hypotenuse.

==================================================

Problem 2 has the correct answer, but one part of the steps is a bit strange. I agree with the 132 ft/sec portion; however, I'm not sure why you wrote \frac{1 \text{ sec}}{132 \text{ ft}}=\frac{0.59\overline{09}}{78 \text{ ft}}*127 \text{ ft}

I would write it as \frac{1\text{ sec}}{132 \text{ ft}}*127 \text{ ft} = \frac{127}{132} \text{ sec} \approx 0.96 \text{ sec}

==================================================

For problem 3, we first need to convert the runner's speed from mph to feet per second.

17.5 \text{ mph} = \frac{17.5 \text{ mi}}{1 \text{ hr}}*\frac{1 \text{ hr}}{60 \text{ min}}*\frac{1 \text{ min}}{60 \text{ sec}}*\frac{5280 \text{ ft}}{1 \text{ mi}} \approx 25.667 \text{ ft per sec}

Since the runner needs to travel 90-12 = 78 ft, this means\text{time} = \frac{\text{distance}}{\text{speed}} \approx \frac{78 \text{ ft}}{25.667 \text{ ft per sec}} \approx 3.039 \text{ sec}

So the runner needs about 3.039 seconds. In problem 2, you calculated that it takes about 0.96 seconds for the ball to go from home to second base. The runner will not beat the throw. The ball gets where it needs to go well before the runner arrives there too.

-------------

The question is now: how much of a lead does the runner need in order to beat the throw?

Well the runner needs to get to second base in under 0.96 seconds.

Let's calculate the distance based on that, and based on the speed we calculated earlier above.

\text{distance} = \text{rate}*\text{time} \approx (25.667 \text{ ft per sec})*(0.96 \text{ sec}) \approx 24.64032 \text{ ft}

This is the distance the runner can travel if the runner only has 0.96 seconds. So the lead needed is 90-24.64032 = 65.35968 feet

This is probably not reasonable considering it's well over halfway (because 65.35968/90 = 0.726 = 72.6%). If the runner is leading over halfway, then the runner is probably already in the running motion and not being stationary.

As you can see, the runner is very unlikely to steal second base. Though of course such events do happen in real life. What may explain this is the reaction time of the catcher may add on just enough time for the runner to steal second base. For this problem however, we aren't considering the reaction time. Also, not all catchers can throw the ball at 90 mph which is quite fast. According to quick research, the MLB says the average catcher speed is about 81.8 mph. This slower throwing speed may account for why stealing second base isn't literally impossible, although it's still fairly difficult.

5 0
3 years ago
How to find the average<br> of 78, 79, 87, 88, 101, 120, 130
crimeas [40]

Answer:

Add the numbers together and divide by the number of numbers. (The sum of values divided by the number of values).

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Need help ASAPPPPPPP
patriot [66]

Answer:

8 is the correct answer because coefficient lies before Exponent. Exponent is variable

So 8 is the coefficient.

5 0
2 years ago
What is the area of this circle?
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

12.57

Step-by-step explanation:

Not rounded it would be 12.56637

If you are just replacing pi with 3.14. than your answer would be exactly 12.56.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the equation of the line that has a slope of -3 and passes through the point (-4,-2)
    12·1 answer
  • What's an expression that can be used to multiply 6 x 198 mentally
    7·2 answers
  • What is the median out of 3,5,6,7,9,6,8
    13·2 answers
  • One model of Earth's population growth is P(t)= 64/(1+11e^0.8t)
    12·1 answer
  • what is the volume of a cylinder in cubic cm with a height of 9cm and a base diameter of 16cm round to the nearest tenths place
    11·1 answer
  • Solve the equation for x=45<br> y=3x+56
    12·2 answers
  • Bob's dog needs medication. He told the veterinarian that the dog weighs 30lbs . The medicine is measured as 16mg for each kilog
    5·1 answer
  • Divide 80,000 by 100 please help
    14·2 answers
  • Guys i need an answer and explain
    12·1 answer
  • A bag contains:
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!